Vaccine: twenty countries suspend injections; does that make you “hesitant?”

by Jon Rappoport

March 19, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

The Guardian: “Several European countries have halted using the Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid vaccine…”

The Guardian has a brand new definition of “several.” Their own article lists the following nations: Austria, Estonia, Latvia, Luxembourg, Lithuania, Romania, Denmark, Norway, Iceland, The Netherlands, Ireland, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Slovenia, Cyprus, Sweden.

Bulgaria and Thailand have also stopped the jab.

The reason for the “pause?” A “small” number of people have developed blood clots.

And now, as I write this, the Wall St. Journal is reporting that European Union medical regulators have decided everything is OK—“the benefits of the shots outweigh the risks.” Standard boilerplate language for: “we don’t have to explain the vaccine injuries or deaths.”

If you believe just a few people with blood clots caused 20 countries to stop giving the jabs, I have condos on Mars for sale.

Hidden behind the firewall of the vaccine establishment, MANY people are keeling over.

And why wouldn’t they? Governments and pharma companies have rushed a new experimental RNA technology into use, for the first time in history. Prior to the COVID injection, all attempts to force approval of RNA tech had failed; dangerous and deadly over-reaction of the immune system was the reason.

Since I seem to be one of the only people saying this, I’ll say it again: Bill Gates, Fauci, and other rabid vaccinators are in love with RNA tech. It allows vaccines to be produced far more quickly, easily, and cheaply.

For any purported virus, at the drop of a hat, companies can come up with a vaccine. It doesn’t take four years. It takes three months.

“We just discovered a virus that crossed over from geese. And here’s a new one from Easter bunnies. And another new one just drifted in from Jupiter. We’ll have vaccines ready by Christmas. The seventh mutation of SARS-CoV-2 has its own vaccine as of yesterday. If you want to take the kiddies to Disneyland, find one of those pretty pink vans parked in your town, take the shot and receive your updated Immunity Certificate…”

Then there is this: the COVID vaccines manufactured by AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna are completely ineffective at preventing serious illness. BY DESIGN.

Months ago, a NY Times piece, by Peter Doshi and Eric Topol, spelled it out.

September 22, 2020: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”:

“If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?” [Clue: “most mild” means cough, or chills and fever, which cure themselves without the need for a vaccine.]

“The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”

“But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”

“According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”

“To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”

The COVID shot: dangerous AND ineffective.

Trump’s coronavirus task force knew the truth. Biden’s task force knows the truth. But they don’t care.

The CDC and the WHO know. They don’t care, either.

But these authorities are very nervous, because droves of people are avoiding the vaccine. It’s not “hesitancy.”

It’s utter rejection.

Sensible rejection.

It began soon after the initial rollout of the Pfizer vaccine. NBC News, December 31, 2020:

“A large percentage of front-line workers in hospitals and nursing homes have refused to take the Covid-19 vaccine…”

“About 50 percent of front-line workers in California’s Riverside County have refused to take the vaccine…”

“Anecdotally, an estimated 60 percent of Ohio nursing home employees have refused the vaccine already…”

“A survey of 2,053 New York City firefighters found that more than half said they would refuse the Covid-19 vaccine when it became available to them…”

And all that was long before 20 countries suspended the injection.

I’ll close, for now, with two statements about the role vaccines have played in eliminating deaths from diseases—because true history matters:

“The combined death rate from scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization. In part, this recession may be attributed to improved housing and to a decrease in the virulence of micro-organisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition.” Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis, Bantam Books, 1977

Robert F Kennedy, Jr.: “After extensively studying a century of recorded data, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Johns Hopkins researchers concluded: ‘Thus vaccinations does not account for the impressive declines in mortality from infectious diseases seen in the first half of the twentieth century’.”

“Similarly, in 1977, Boston University epidemiologists (and husband and wife) John and Sonja McKinlay published their seminal work in the Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly on the role that vaccines (and other medical interventions) played in the massive 74% decline in mortality seen in the twentieth century: ‘The Questionable Contribution of Medical Measures to the Decline of Mortality in the United States in the Twentieth Century’.”

“In this article, which was formerly required reading in U.S. medical schools, the McKinlays pointed out that 92.3% of the mortality rate decline happened between 1900 and 1950, before most vaccines existed, and that all medical measures, including antibiotics and surgeries, ‘appear to have contributed little to the overall decline in mortality in the United States since about 1900 — having in many instances been introduced several decades after a marked decline had already set in and having no detectable influence in most instances’.”


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

14 comments on “Vaccine: twenty countries suspend injections; does that make you “hesitant?”

  1. notgoodatenglish says:

    i have a strong feeling the experimental vax has something to do with the Cruetzfeldt-Jakob neurological disease outbreak currently happening which killed Dr Baselga who was the chief scientist at astrazeneca. Cruetzfeldt-Jakob is caused by prions. i dont know how credible this is but take a look

    https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf

    Deborah Tavares – Emergency Alert 03/05/2021
    long interview with Deborah Tavares

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOPP2GKe36w

    outbreak in canada

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/mystery-neurological-disease-neil-cashman-1.5957196

    either way NO ONE should be taking these harmful and deadly experimental vax

  2. Someone Who Knows says:

    As someone who has just lost someone very close to them, dying within 24 hours of taking this experimental poison, I’ve no doubt that this “small number” is probably growing at a faster rate than one of the exponential curves on one of Neil Ferguson’s graphs.

    These criminals need to be stopped. NOW.

  3. Paul says:

    TO ANY KY VOTERS:

    I have sent Jon’s articles to my particular state Governor.

    I have not sent them to the US Senators, because it would be a waste of time, as they waste space also.

    I think sending valuable info to your elected officials is good, but best done by in-state, registered voters.

    If you watched Sen. Rand Paul’s questioning of Fauci during the recent Senate hearing, I would ask this of KY residents.

    Watch the hearing (C-SPAN archives), & if you agree, thank the senator for his excellent questioning & attach Jon’s article & let Rand know of Jon’s research as a resource.

    Rand cited medical articles to Fauci & Jon dug up these ones, that Rand should read.

    Thank you.

  4. I wish this article included links for its factual claims.
    I was considering sharing it, but without links it seems less reliale.

  5. Fenwick says:

    Sadly, three of my sisters-in-law have had both doses of the mRNA vaccines and I am worried sick about their future, although I do not discuss it with them because what’s done is done.

    What is happening to the World and where do we go from here? I am considering never going to a doctor again and foregoing all preventative interventions.

  6. Eluard says:

    This AstraZeneca shot apparently uses DNA rather than RNA to stimulate the “spike protein” in the cells:

    “The Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines both use mRNA as their platform for delivering the genetic instructions. AstraZeneca-Oxford’s uses DNA instead, and the DNA is delivered to cells with the help of another virus known as an adenovirus. (Other Covid-19 vaccine developers, like CanSino Biologics and Johnson & Johnson, are also using adenovirus vectors.”

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/why-the-astrazeneca-oxford-covid-19-vaccine-is-different/ar-BB1bhP1n

  7. Liv 4ever says:

    I agree , but why is asstra xenika singled out. I think all vaccines downside far outweighs any “perceived ” upside. But I suspect there could be more ar play. Perhaps political motivations? Ass tra xenika is a Swedish firm. You might want to track the kroner against the other currency markets. I can’t say for sure though because these people never invite me to their parties.
    In any case, it seems that a.z. Is being singled out as the bad boy by all the fake news outlets. Usually this means that the big pump and dump club is up to their old tricks again.

  8. Sean says:

    It’s utter rejection.

    It’s sensible rejection.

    I received an email from a Prepping source that I have spent quite a few bucks on to learn prepping. How to do this and do that e books. Which are quite educational and do help give me a fighting chance in worst case scenarios, that Id otherwise have no clue.

    The email was primarily debunking vaccine myths. I read it. Then sent them an email back. I said, I have spent alot of money learning how to prevent and prepare from you. And that Im blown away you would send this out. Please never send me another one. The CDC and the WHO are criminal and have no credibility because of their disinformation. Knock yourself spreading exactly what they tell you to send out, I wont stop you. Just dont send it over here again.

    They got to my prepper source.

  9. Opie Poik says:

    Criminals:
    Simon & Schuster To Release Children’s Book About Fauci
    https://www.targetliberty.com/2021/03/simon-schuster-to-release-childrens.html

  10. Tim says:

    Well, there you have it. The sorcerers and snake-oil concocters and sellers con-game exposed.
    The funny thing is… it is literally sorcery(black magic)…
    What is “black magic”? The “science” of deception.
    Perception manipulation for “evil” purpose/effect. A somewhat relative statement, the primary motive is to TAKE/STEAL something of value from another.
    Like maybe; awareness, creativity, power. To blind someone and substitute a fraudulent idea for that which they have lost awareness of(been blinded to) is a form of (virtually)reducing the power of one and (virtually)inflating the power of another.

    And so now we have this huge “health care industry”(a misnomer), and all these people who think/believe(?) they are helpers of humanity, they have been elevated to “hero” status, they are privileged and beyond reproach as long as they stay subservient to the system.

    Along with the frankenstein-scientists, elevated to the levels of Priests and High-Priests. For a false-god. An imposter and hypocrite, insane, in fact.
    Welcome to Never Never Land. Never will be “real”.
    The Truth(The Real ONE) Sets Us Free.
    Always Always Land.

  11. No More lies says:

    Here is a great link with a video to watch. Sheds some light on how much control Bill Gates is pushing for in the WHO:
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/03/joseph-mercola/who-insider-blows-whistle-on-gates-and-gavi/

    Also, can anybody in California tell me where and how I can get Ivermectin? Thanks again for all your help.

  12. Dan says:

    You cite the New York Times article from 9/22/20. It says how the vaccines would help prevent mild cases of COVID-19, but not moderate and severe cases. I’ve been hearing the opposite for the last three months. Either way it’s concluded that the “vaccines” don’t prevent one from becoming infected, therefore are not true vaccines, rather genetic “therapy” injections. Also if the shots don’t prevent infection, how can one speak of herd immunity being acquired this way? Are the conclusions of that NYT article still valid? I’ve been telling people the shot will prevent serious illness, hospitalization, and death, but not mild cases. What’s the truth or is the jury still out on this issue?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *