-US Major General in charge of all army intelligence in the world says 911 a fraud, media saying what they are told to say. Learn more. Type into YouTube 'us major general 911 fraud', also available on disclose.tv

-Willie Nelson talks about 9-11.(the wool's been pulled over people's eyes; YouTube 'willie nelson 911')

-9/11 investigation.

-The guy's voice in.Two Screens, Two Pills.at 8:33-8:47.(type into YouTube), when compared with the.The 9/11 Solution.(YouTube), at the 1:03-2:29 mark; sounds like the same guy. Was it a set up as part of the 9/11 con?

-Video with Professor David Ray Griffin on the official narrative on the 9/11 con.(type 'professor david ray griffin' into globalresearch.ca)

-A full length movie about it on YouTube and elsewhere:.Fabled Enemies

-Harassment of an official videographer for the U.S. government, Kurt Sonnenfeld was detailed to Ground Zero on September 11, 2001, where he spent one month filming 29 tapes:."What I saw at certain moments and in certain places is very disturbing!"
   This is the story that drives another nail into the coffin of the account the government provided of the 9/11 events. An exclusive interview.(type 'fema videographer at ground zero goes public' dprogram.net). Excerpts:."It was very odd to me when I learned that FEMA and several other federal agencies had already moved into position at their command center at Pier 92 on September 10th, one day before the attacks! I definitely harbor some doubts about the authenticity of the 'jet' turbine, far too small to have come from one of the Boeings! The collapse of Building 7 was hardly mentioned by the mainstream media and suspiciously ignored by the 911 Commission. When they moved into their new building at 1 Penn Plaza in Manhattan, they proudly hung on the lobby wall their Commissioners Citation Plaque and their big round US Customs Service ensign, also miraculously recovered, in pristine condition, from their crushed and cremated former office building at the World Trade Center. I am familiar with the scientists and qualified professionals to whom you refer and their findings are convincing, credible and presented according to scientific protocol in stark contrast to the findings of the 'official' investigation. In addition, numerous intelligence agents and government officials have now come forward with their very informed opinions that the 911 Commission was a farce at best or a cover-up at worst."

-From Wikipedia entry:."Two American Airlines aircraft were hijacked and crashed during the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack: Flight 77, a Boeing 757 and Flight 11, a Boeing 767. Although these flights were daily departures before and a month after September 11, 2001. Neither flight 11 nor 77 were scheduled on September 11, 2001.".The records kept by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics.(bts.gov/gis/).do not list either flight that day.

-More 9/11 anomalies. Type '911 anomalies'
..1.(brasschecktv.com)
..2.American Airlines confirms on Wikipedia that Flights 11 and 77 did not fly on Sept. 11.(type '911 attack' fourwinds10.com)
..3.(whatreallyhappened.com)
..4.(historycommons.org)
..5.(serendipity.li)
..6.(uk.video.yahoo.com also type 'former governor of minnesota reveals how us government planned lies to get into a war)
..7.(globalresearch.ca)

-Who profited big time from the World Trade Center destruction?.(YouTube).(more at indybay.org)

-The 9/11 con continues, as does the Oklahoma bombing con.(video.google.ca)

-Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.(kickthemallout.com)

-The following from Google/YouTube: The WTC towers' financial dealings that went on before the 9/11 disaster.

-9/11. No planes!.(brasschecktv.com). Were they inserted graphics?.(YouTube) Was it doctored footage to hoodwink the public. Eye 'witnesses' would have been needed.
   To insert graphics that would be made to move was too difficult considering the detailed background and the time necessary to adjust each pixel of any inserted plane graphic to match perfectly with the high detail of the background behind the twin towers in the original footage. Is that why you see no background in the second reported footage on mainstream media like was seen in the original footage? Like hello! Was none of this tracked on radar? Nobody warned anyone. What really went on here which resulted quickly in the removing of the rights of Americans with the Patriot Act?

-The hoax part of 9/11. Type in YouTube 'The attacks on September 11, 2001 were an inside job'.(has 4 parts).

-Footage from the firemen's cameras. Type in YouTube or Google 'FDNY 9/11 Part 1 of 11'

-1,700+ Engineers, Intelligence Service, Senior Military, Law Enforcement, Government officials, Architects, Pilots, Aviation professionals, Professors question 9/11.(patriotsquestion911.com)

-No Planes on 911 Exposed by FOX NEWS.(YouTube)

-Views of 9/11 disaster altered?.(YouTube)

-9/11 Witness: Jennifer Oberstein, No Plane.(YouTube)

-9/11 Inside Job. The Most Damning Evidence Yet.(YouTube)

-Rare Amateur 911 Video Footage News 9-11 WTC Twin Towers 1,2.(sure looks like controlled demolition YouTube)

-Ignored E-4B Aired 6 Yrs Later By CNN, Censored on 9/11/01.(YouTube)

-9/11 Video Clips Dan Rather Would Rather Not Show You.(YouTube)

-Nothing distinguishes wreckage of any plane allegedly to have hit the Pentagon building.(YouTube)

-9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!.(regular people mention explosions, not planes hitting, YouTube).

-WTC building 7.(YouTube)

-How the 9/11 cover story was sold to the public.(brasschecktv.com)

-The fake hijackers and ten reasons it was a hoax as the media reported it.(YouTube)

-Aviation reality on 9/11.(brasschecktv.com)

-The top 40 reasons to doubt the official story of 9/11.(911truth.org)

-The Cleveland Airport Mystery.(type 'cleveland airport mystery' 911woodybox.blogspot.com)

-Noam Chomsky on 9/11.(YouTube)

-Local news channel reports on 9/11.(type 'kerrville911truth' into YouTube)

-"The first thing that critics of investigations on 9/11 do is to link all the questions, including some of the most hair brained ideas, together in a crazy hodgepodge of irrationality that undermines legitimate investigations. There is often a series of logical.fallacies used by critics of controversial issues, including personal ad hominem attacks, red herring and straw person distractions and false dilemmas. Because many people are taken in or confused by these irrationalities, most journalists are fearful of being labeled conspiracy theorists. To protect their careers journalists, especially those in corporate media, will steer their inquiries to safer stories. In 2007, Project Censored covered research into the events of 9/11 by Brigham Young University physics professor Steven E. Jones. Dr. Jones concluded that the official explanation for the collapse of the World Trade Center.(WTC).buildings was implausible according to laws of physics. Jones called for an independent, international scientific investigation."guided not by politicized notions and constrains but rather by observations and calculations".
   David Ray Griffin has just completed a new book on this subject. To support this theory, Jones and eight other scientists conducted chemical research on the dust from the WTC. Their research results were published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. The Open Chemical Physics Journal, Volume 2, 2009, entitled 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe'. In the abstract the authors write."We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic". Thermite is a pyrotechnic composition of a metal powder and a metal oxide, which produces a thermite reaction and is used in controlled demolitions of buildings. 

"Additionally, architect Richard Gage, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.(his documentary on it is below), has to date amassed nearly 700 scientific professionals in the fields of architecture, engineering and physics who have signed a petition calling for a new investigation of the events of 9/11. Gage and Jones' empirical research suggesting the possibility of controlled demolition at the WTC has moved many thousands of others to question the events of 9/11. The factual arguments clearly establish the possibility of controlled demolition of the WTC buildings on September 11, 2001, yet, there is almost zero coverage in the corporate media in the US. This is top down corporate censorship pure and simple. Even if other scientists can be found to disagree with the study, the policy of ignoring the topic inside the corporate media is relatively absolute. It seems unlikely that corporate journalists are unaware of the research, as it is listed on hundreds of websites worldwide. Perhaps the mainstream science journalists left their critical thinking skills at home and gave the scientific method the day off. Or maybe the real conspiracy exists within the boardrooms of the corporate mainstream media." ...Peter Phillips, Professor of Sociology at Sonoma State University, President of Media Freedom Foundation, Board member for 9/11truth.org and recent past director of Project Censored. This article was presented at the 9/11 Truth Film Festival Oakland Grand Lake Theater.(September 10, 2009). The complete article at global research.ca

.(globalresearch.ca)