.
S
i t e S e a r c h
A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ
List
of Topics__Ask
Suby__Free
Stuff__Questions
Lists
Terms
of Use__________________Privacy
Policy
C
r e a t i o n I n d e x
C r e a t i o n
p a g e
5 2 c
"If the universe is not much
bigger than we can observe and if it was only 50 times smaller in the past
than it is now, then scientific deduction
based on
General
Relativity means it has to have expanded out of a previous state
in which it was surrounded by an event
horizon.(a
condition known technically as a 'white hole';.a
black
hole running in reverse, something permitted by the equations of GR).
"An observer on Earth would
not in any way 'feel different.' 'Billions of years' would be available.(in
the frame of reference within which it is traveling in deep space).for
light to reach the Earth, for stars to age, etc., while less than an
ordinary day is passing on Earth.
"This massive gravitational
time dilation
would seem to be a scientific inevitability
if a bounded
universe has expanded significantly."....D.
Russell Humphreys,.Starlight
and Time,.Green
Forest, AR: Master Books, 1994.
{1} T.G. Norman and B. Setterfield,
The
Atomic Constants, Light and Time (privately published, 1990).
{2} D.R. Humphreys, 'Progress
Toward a Young-Earth Relativistic Cosmology', Proceedings 3rd ICC,
Pittsburgh, PA, 1994, p. 267-286.
{3} J. Byl, 'On Time Dilation
in Cosmology', Creation Research Society Quarterly, 1997, 34 (1):26-32.
{4} D.R. Humphreys, 'It's
Just a Matter of Time', Creation Research Society Quarterly, 1997,
34 (1):32-34.
{5} S.R. Conner and D.N.
Page, 'Starlight and Time Is the Big Bang', CEN Technical Journal,
1998, 12 (2):174-194.
{6} D.R. Humphreys, 'New
Vistas of Space-time Rebut the Critics', CEN Technical Journal,
1998, 12 (2):195-212. See further discussion in CEN Technical Journal,
1999, 13 (1):49-62.
