https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/unconstitutional-co-author-of-canadas-1982-charter-of-rights-rebukes-illegal-covid-policies/

The last surviving architect of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms condemned the 'callous' and 'unconstitutional' abuses of the 1982 Charter by Canadian governments in the name of the so-called COVID pandemic.

Brian Peckford, the former premier of Newfoundland, spoke out strongly against the transgressions performed against each citizen's Charter rights via vaccine mandates and other COVID-related measures, in a video seminar hosted by pro-freedom group Action4Canada Wednesday evening. "I never thought in my wildest dreams, that the day I am now a part of would ever come" lamented Peckford. "I don't think anybody … the people at the (1982) conference, ever thought that the day would come … that the governments of this nation would so callously look upon the Charter of Rights today as they are doing, have done in the last two years and are doing as we speak."

Explaining the importance and relevance of the Charter in these unprecedented times, Peckford outlined the most important aspects of the 1982 document and described the transgressions occurring today at the hands of Canadian governments at all levels.

"Section 52 of that Charter says the supreme law of Canada is the Constitution.(of which the Charter is a part), no other law supersedes this constitutional law", Peckford paraphrased. "So, you are on safe ground … When we talk about the Charter of Rights and Freedoms we're talking about the supreme law of Canada. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms are in the Constitution."

"As mentioned earlier, there are at least four provisions in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which are extremely important: Section 2, Section 6, Section 7 and Section 15" added Peckford. 

"And Section 2 has to do with your.freedom of expression, your.freedom of conscience, your.freedom of religion, your.freedom of assembly, your.freedom of association. That's under Section 2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Make no mistake about it."

Peckford describes that per Section 1 of the Constitution Act of 1982, the only means in which the government can override these fundamental rights in any capacity, is if."they can demonstrably justify taking those actions".

According to Peckford and Section 1,."demonstrably justifying the measures has to be done in law within reasonable limits in accordance with a free and democratic society".

We loosely use the word 'democratic' which should never be used, once known for what it means. Better to use the words We the People.

"This is depraved, this is illegal, this is criminal, this is unconstitutional", added the lawyer. "There is no scientific basis to the measures and we can prove that in a court of law."

***

From Explore! Volume 11, Number 4, 2002. Thermography vs. Mammography

"...there is a relatively little known about that other procedure that can help make the differentiation between cancer and benign, known as DIGITAL INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY. A Digital THERMOGRAM is a heat-sensing camera that develops a color image on a Windows-based computer screen, based upon temperature differentials on the surface of any area of the body. It's programmed to represent warm temperatures on the red end of the spectrum and cool temperatures on the Blue end. A woman imaging her Breasts simply has to stand or sit in front of the camera and within 12 seconds an image appears on the computer. It DOESN’T have PHYSICAL CONTACT with the body and DOESN’T introduce IONIZING RADIATION into the woman's breast, as is done during Mammographic Imaging, which most people believe can provoke a malignancy to form.

"Currently most radiologists and the Allopathic Medical community do not recognize Thermography as a test to perform and believe that Mammograms are the only tests to have! This is a prejudicial barrier that needs to fall."

Just why would the medical system be adverse to a safe procedure?