.
.
S i t e  S e a r c h
.
A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ
.
List of Topics__Ask Suby__Free Stuff__Questions Lists
Terms of Use__________________Privacy Policy
.
I n d e x  V  N o t e s  1

Comprised with
Vaccination Questions to ask
"The next time you visit your doctor, after your doctor is done telling you how safe vaccines are, ask him this question with the 9 magic words.(from vactruth.com): "If this vaccine injures my child, who is responsible?"

"Your doctor will likely blush, get angry with you or avoid the question altogether. What the doctor will avoid telling you is that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe! This means that even if vaccines are handled and given properly, some children will die or will be hurt.

"The reality—and the answer to the question—is this:.You are responsible if your child is injured! Vaccines dictate to you what goes on in your body. That's totalitarianism and takes us back to the criminals Mussolini and Hitler. Dictating 'what goes into your body' violates all things freedom means and violates the highest law there is. That's Common Law based on God's principles as also reflected in the Nuremberg Code.

"The National Child Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.protects the manufacturer from liability for 'unavoidable'.(unavoidable that is, if one has been convinced that vaccines are safe, which they are not and allows the poisons in them to be injected into the body).adverse side effects as long as the vaccine is properly prepared and accompanied by the proper directions and warnings..(14)"

Are they properly prepared? No. Have they ever been properly tested? No. Do you know what proper testing is? If not, why would you risk your child's life in agreeing to being injected with any vaccine? Why would vaccine manufacturers be concerned when they are scott free of any unhealthy repercussions for using their products?

"The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.(VICP).also protects your doctor from any liability if a vaccine injures your baby.

They are putting at risk, whoever they can vax.

"Conclusion: If you decide to vaccinate your child, you do so at your own risk..Don't be a lazy intellectual loafer by going carelessly ahead with something proven highly risky.

"Your doctor can tell you vaccines are perfectly safe and your child will be 'protected', but the ones who are really protected are the doctors and the vaccine companies:.Job 13:4 "But you are forgers of lies, you are all physicians of no value."

Ask if the vaccine contains any M2C5 a dangerous ingredient; look it up. Ask if the PCR test contains sodium azite, a strong poison. Ask why they don't ask you to spit in a vial, they could use that. Don't allow them to ram the stick up your nose. It can reach the brain base rupturing its delicate film and placing poison into the brain. Realize, they know this. That's why it's done. Duh! Truly, they are out to hurt, maim and kill you.

Ask if there's a guarantee that no iatrogenic reaction will occur. Remind the doctor of his hypocratic oath, if he or she even cares.

See the vaccine ingredients. And look at the vaccine schedule.(type into a search engine).and see how much is going to be injected into your child.

You wouldn't mix mercury, aluminum phosphate, ammonium sulfate and formaldehyde.(and depending on the vaccination, there are many other dangerous and hidden ingredients added that will shock you).with what they say are viruses.(by what  they tell you, it shows they don't know what the hell a virus is or perhaps they do and hide this from you, leading you down the road of belief that a virus could infect you, which it cannot, so what has science shown is actually a virus?).and then get a syringe and inject it into your child. That's child endangerment and abuse. Some people, obviously not the bright ones, allow their doctors to do it.

By dismissing the reasonable concerns of parents the trust of those who are being asked to take the risks.(children).is dismissed.

More questions to ask your doctor:

-I'm struggling to make intelligent and informed decisions to protect my child's health, so I have some questions. When I have all the facts from both sides I can then make an intelligent decision. I will proceed on the basis of consent based upon full disclosure of pertinent information:

...What is the incidence of all these diseases my child is being vaccinated against? Could I see the reports please?

...What nanoparticles are in vaccines and why are they there?

...Doctor, how are vaccines safe and effective when they do not protect against all strains of a so-called.virus, thus allowing for the creation of new more virulent and heretofore unknown health anomalies due to the fact of non-targeted virus strains?

...What tests have you available for me to see that have proved efficacy?

...What do the vaccine monographs which are included with every vaccine, say about the ingredients in vaccines and which ones are the most dangerous?

...Doctor, do you have a list of the ingredients added, which are in such minute amounts that they are not required to be listed?

...What vaccine or vaccines are you wanting my child to have and what are the ingredients in each and let me see the research on effects of combining vaccines and/or ingredients?

...Doctor, does the vaccine in question contain any animal cells, detergents, polysorbate 80, formaldehyde, gelatin, mercury and any more problematic adjuvants such as aluminum, AS03, MF59 and squalene and if the serious problem with latex and rubber stoppers used in the vials has been addressed and how?
   For example, DTP, a common vaccine given to most newborns, is produced using formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, polysorbate 80 and gelatin. In some cases, thimerosal.(mercury in the form of sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate).still is used, as in the flu shot.

Aluminum is eliminated from the body primarily through the kidneys. Infant kidney function.(glomerular filtration rate).is low at birth and does not reach full capacity until one to two years of age. ...Simmer, K. Aluminium in Infancy. In: Zatta PF, Alfrey AC. (Eds) Aluminium Toxicity in Infants' Health and Disease. 1997, World Scientific Publishing.

...Doctor, do vaccines override the normal immune system and why is this necessary to do before one's immune system is fully formed and if after that, if they child has been healthy, why not let the stronger natural immune system handle the health of a male or female as has been done for thousands of years?

...Doctor, why are vaccinations given to those with strong and developing immune systems? Doctor, where are the test results showing the immune system is not compromised when a vaccine is administered?

...Doctor, do you have vaccine test results for me to see that were done both by the manufacturers and also by independent reputable laboratories, both getting completely safe results? Vaccine effectiveness is one thing, safety of them however, is the main concern. What doctor is effectiveness if it causes harm? A blow torch is effective in ridding the skin of bacteria that may be harmful, but it destroys the skin.
   Vaccines vary in efficacy and many who have been vaccinated still contract the disease; therefore, vaccines do not necessarily protect against disability and death from disease. In addition, vaccines have been documented to cause certain disabilities, even death. Doctor, do you think it is worth risking this on my child whom I will have to look after, perhaps for a lifetime, if he is seriously affected?
   There are no true double-blind, placebo controlled studies used in vaccine research. Why doctor, would these have been avoided? New vaccines are compared against another vaccine with a 'known side effect profile'. Therefore 'control group' is given a 'placebo' that is really another vaccine and not a saline, sterile water or no vaccine at all. Not at all honest and these comparisons are done by those manufacturing the vaccines! Why do they care so little for the health of people to have done this dishonesty?

...Doctor, if vaccines are preventative for some diseases, why are those vaccinated getting the diseases they were vaccinated to prevent.(type into type into an Internet search engine 'vaccinated and getting the disease'). Doctor, do you think vaccines are working? Doctor, I've seen charts that contradict vaccine manufacturers where they say 'smallpox has been eradicated due to vaccines being administrated', but history shows what really eradicated smallpox and other diseases and it wasn't vaccines, but sanitation.

...Doctor, are you aware that most of the common childhood diseases were declining in terms of morbidity.(complications).and mortality.(death).prior to the introduction of vaccinations, according to information obtained directly from government sources. Have you read that information?

...Doctor, can you guarantee in writing the success and safety of vaccinations, so that I can sue if something goes wrong? If not why should I as a parent accept the risk? Exactly what accountability exists if something does go wrong?

...Doctor, the purpose of a vaccine is to prevent the disease, is it not? Why then should it be a matter of concern to those who chose to have the shot whether or not I choose to have mine?

...Doctor, how do you know how many infections have been prevented by vaccines and how many infections have been prevented by other means such as natural immunity? Doctor, where are the studies comparing the non vaccinated with the vaccinated? I'd like to examine them.

..Doctor, do you have papers for me to see on the long-term consequences of vaccines on the immune systems of children under two years of age? If not, where have you seen these studies and what have they shown?

..Doctor, do you have studies to show me on the autoimmune risks? and if there are no risks, where are the papers showing it to be so?

...Doctor, what is the cumulative effect of toxins in vaccines including heavy metals, as most vaccines these days are given in combination?
   Dr. H.H. Fudenberg, world-renowned immunologist with hundreds of publications to his credit, made the following comments."One vaccine decreases cell-mediated immunity by 50%, two vaccines by 70%...all triple vaccines.(MMR, DTaP, etc.).markedly impair cell-mediated immunity, which predisposes to recurrent viral infections.".Doctor, why are we injecting up to 56 vaccines from pre-birth to age six?

...Doctor, do you have full information about the vaccine's side effects.(injuries).and if so, what is the information?

...Doctor, if I decide to go ahead with vaccination, do you retain and provide to parents the vaccine manufacturer's name and lot number for each vaccine a child may receive?

...Doctor, what vaccines that you know of contain GMOs.(genetically modified ingredients)?

...Doctor, at what point does an immune system become overloaded? What long term tracking studies have you seen regarding this important point and just how do they vary from person to person?

...Doctor, what about the measles vaccine's potential to cause vaccine-induced SSPE? a degenerative neurological condition, which affects a person's behavior, memory and coordination, leading to fits, blindness and eventually death. The Disabled World News 2010 says that the symptoms a person with SSPE experiences are subtle: They usually include symptoms such as changes in behavior and mild mental deterioration such as memory loss. Why is it that you would risk my child to such things?

...Doctor, what are the effects upon cell damage each vaccine causes and especially brain cells?

...Doctor, is vaccination a cost effective way of disease prevention? The wholesale price for vaccines used in the U.S. pediatric schedule is more than $170 per child. Given that there are more than 77,000 live births per week in the U.S., that equals more than $13 million each week aimed at preventing a few childhood infections that build natural immunity. And, the estimated lifetime cost of caring for one autistic.(usually vaccine-injured).child is more than $4.5 million.

...Doctor, why are vaccine promotions focused on mass populations, rather than nutrition strengthening foods being aimed at one's immune system? Why are effective methods for building immune systems, used for centuries, avoided in favor of toxic vaccines? 

***


Comprised from the International Medical Council on Vaccination.(VaccinationCouncil.org).a report which covers:

A list of the many MDs, PhDs, NDs and other medical professionals who are signing onto this document covering:

Why vaccines have NEVER been proven safe or effective.

A list of some of the serious health side effects caused by vaccines.

Why autism is conclusively associated with vaccines.

The profit and hidden world depopulation motivation behind the pharmaceutical industry's big vaccine push.

A list of which institutions and organizations profit from your sickness.

The shocking truth about what's IN vaccines.(aborted fetal tissue, 59 different chemicals, DNA from diseased animals and more)

An overview of some of the most dangerous vaccine ingredients.

The truth about conflicts of interest in the vaccine community and why doctors profit from vaccination policies.

Why vaccinated children have far worse health outcomes than unvaccinated children.

How to opt out of 'mandatory' vaccines. Why would they make poisoning mandatory?

Important advice for parents about how to protect the health of your children while saying NO to vaccines.

Online resources for learning more about the dangers of vaccines.

A list of recommended reading materials for further education.

-A Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus Contaminated Vaccines? An article by Jeffry John Aufderheide February 10th, 2013 on  vactruth.com

The polio vaccine is produced using three types of polio virus and can contain formaldehyde, phenoxyethanol.(antifreeze), sucrose.(table sugar), neomycin, streptomycin, polymyxin B and VERO cells.(a continuous line of monkey kidney cells)

"In the 1950s and 1960s, the polio vaccine was manufactured using monkey kidneys to grow the viruses.

"Bernice Eddy, who at the time was a scientist at the Division of Biologics Standards.(DBS), discovered a major problem. Page 500 of the Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session. April 20, 21; and May 3, 4, 1972, states:

"The next and only serious vaccine crisis that has occurred since the polio episode was the realization in mid-1961 that a monkey virus later shown to cause tumors in hamsters was contaminating both polio and adenovirus vaccines. The virus, known as SV40.(look up SV40, type in an Internet search engine for videos on it), was entering the vaccines and, just as in the polio case was surviving the formalin.(a form of formaldehyde).treatment.

"There were several states by which the full extent of the SV40 problem became known. First was the discovery in 1959-1960 by a DBS.(Division of Biologics Standards).scientist, once again Bernice Eddy, that an unknown agent in the monkey kidney cells used to produce polio and adenovirus vaccines would cause tumors when the cells were injected into hamsters.".(6)

"Page 505 of the same congressional document declares,

"...even when the contaminating virus was found to be oncogenic.(cancer causing).in hamsters, the DBS.(Division of Biologics Standards, National Institute of Health {NIH}).and its expert advisory committee decided to leave existing stocks on the market rather than risk eroding public confidence by a recall...There has been a tendency on the part of certain higher government circles to play down any open discussion of problems associated with vaccines."

"Even to this day, the Centers for Disease Control plays damage control and minimizes any problems associated with the cancer-causing monkey virus that contaminated the polio vaccine..(7)

"Phages Contaminate Vaccines?

"In February, 1975 Gina Bari Kolata wrote an article entitled Phage in Live Virus Vaccines: Are They Harmful to People? Gina Bari Kolata wrote:

"Almost 2 years ago, scientists at the Bureau of Biologics of the Food and Drug Administration.(FDA).reported that all live virus vaccines are grossly contaminated with phage. This finding presented a problem since federal regulations forbade extraneous material in vaccines and no one knew whether phage are harmful to human beings or whether they could be removed from vaccines. The temporary solution was to amend the regulations so as to permit phage in vaccines.".(8)

"Where did the bacteriophage come from?

"According to the article, the phages, which are viruses that infect bacteria, contaminate the 'fetal bovine serum' collected at the slaughterhouse that subsequently is used as vaccine growth medium. The filthy process of bovine 'fetus management' was encapsulated in this manner:

"The room is dirty and, according to one spokesman "one minute you have nothing to do and the next minute you are literally knee deep in fetuses.".(8)

"Kolata noted that one unintended consequence from the contamination was the phage's ability to trigger a different disease. She explained that a person who was given the polio vaccine contaminated with diphtheria phage could actually contract diphtheria!

"FDA's tolerance of vaccine contaminants manifested years later. For example, a court case decided in 1987 revealed "Each seed virus used in manufacture shall be demonstrated to be free of extraneous microbial agents except for unavoidable bacteriophage.".(9)

"This isn't a problem that magically went away.

"Bovine serum is frequently used as a growth medium as a part of the vaccine manufacturing process. It has been the major source of contamination in vaccines..(10

"The most prevailing bovine contaminants are:

• bovine viral diarrhoea pestivirus
• parainfluenza virus type 3
• bovine herpesvirus 1
• bovine enterovirus type 4
• bovine orbivirus.(bluetongue)
• bovine polyomavirus
• bovine parvoviruses.(10, 11)

"One paper suggests that vaccines contaminated with the bluetongue virus caused abortions in pregnant dogs..(12)

"There are also patents to detect new pathogens that are likely contaminating other cell cultures to make flu vaccines..(13)

"And to bring this full circle to the beginning of the article . . .

"Contaminated Vaccines 1952–Today: The scientific literature has an abundance of evidence that vaccines are contaminated. The FDA and CDC have access to the very same information contained in this article—and much more. Vaccines are kept on the shelves even if they are contaminated because, if recalled, your confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness would be eroded.

"Result: Product Stays on the Shelf."

"References
1..(link no longer works: fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/postmarketdrugsafety...)
2..(cdc.gov/salmonella/typhimurium-cantaloupe-08-12/index.html)
3..(link no longer works: fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/CORENetwork/ucm320413.htm)
4..(cdc.gov/ecoli/2012/O157H7-11-12/index.html)
5..(fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/FungalMeningitis/default.htm)
6. Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session, April 20, 21; and May 3, 4, 1972.
7..(link no longer works: cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/updates/archive/polio_and_cancer.htm)
8..(sciencemag.org/content/187/4176/522.extract)
9. Wade Baker and Rita Baker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 86-5578. Submitted Dec. 4, 1986.
10..(ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1665461)
11..(ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10636817)
12..(ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9119141)
13..(faqs.org/patents/app/20090081252#ixzz0Yj7RZg0n)
14..(law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/300aa-22)

-From an article reproduced at.(whale.to/a/logic.html)
"This is from Bronwyn Hancock on the AVN list in Australia, commenting to someone else on the list who hasn't read one iota about vaccine dangers. I thought it was excellent and wanted to share with others and Bronwyn gave permission.

"Bronwyn Hancock.(vaccination.inoz.com), Vaccination Information Service.

"LOGIC dictates that you research a subject before you comment on it.

"LOGIC dictates that you don't assume a claim is true when it is supporting one of the biggest and most powerful industries in the world.

"LOGIC dictates that no matter how often a claim is repeated, it does not make it true, though as Hitler knew, if you repeat it often enough, the masses will believe it and ardently so.

"When you do some research and discover that vaccines contain some of the most poisonous compounds and elements known to man and foreign organic material that is also toxic when injected into anything, i.e. formaldehyde, mercury and aluminum compounds, phenol.(carbolic acid), borax.(ant killer; but, unlike the other poisons, in very tiny amounts can do the body good), methanol, dye, acetone.(solvent, polish remover), disinfectant, glycerine, antifreeze, MSG and several other poisons, plus also toxic when injected, animal organ tissue and blood.(e.g. monkey, cow, chicken, pig, sheep, dog, etc), contaminant animal viruses.(e.g. SV40, which causes cancer in humans), aborted human fetus cells, large foreign proteins, mutated.(more virulent).human viruses in high doses, bacterial endotoxins, antibiotics, bacteria, genetically modified yeast, latex and animal, bacterial and viral DNA, which, when injected, can be incorporated into the recipient's DNA, then LOGIC dictates that you question whether violent poisons, which by definition are very harmful, are really going to be good for any living creature's immune system, let alone your tiny infant with its very immature immune and neurological systems.

"LOGIC also dictates that man was not created with an immune system designed not to be able to work until the twentieth century when it only could do so by man's intervention, particularly when the intervention was to poison it.

"Some people will have enough LOGIC to stop there, but if you want to go further or have missed discovering the above and delve into medical research, then LOGIC dictates that you study the pro-vaccination articles properly and not rely on unsupported conclusions of authors paid by vaccine manufacturers.

"LOGIC dictates that if a vaccine was introduced AFTER a decline in the disease, then it was not responsible for that decline.

"LOGIC dictates that because outbreaks occur amongst fully vaccinated populations, often with those not vaccinated not even contracting the disease, vaccines are not protecting people against disease.

"LOGIC dictates that if you have 'no previous vaccination' history as a guideline in disease diagnosis, supported with teaching doctors that, vaccinated people just don't get the disease, then you are likely to get low reported figures of disease cases in vaccinated people, no matter how ineffective, or rather counterproductive, vaccination actually is.

"LOGIC dictates that since the documented effect of vaccines is to 'SENSITIZE' the immune system and 'sensitize' means anaphylaxis, which is the opposite of prophylaxis, which means prevention, then vaccines do the opposite of prevention.

"LOGIC dictates that since sensitization is such a big problem in highly vaccinated populations where the problem is confined to these, by the way; asthma alone killing 800 people in this country every year, then without doing any more research, one would already be able to guess that vaccines are quite likely killing a large number of people.

"LOGIC dictates that since only the vaccinated can get the new, more dangerous, atypical forms of diseases.(e.g. atypical measles), then vaccination is not terribly protective!

"LOGIC and indeed medical policy dictates that if you administer any vaccine or other procedure to a healthy person and a serious event immediately occurs, you have to consider that procedure as the cause of the event, particularly when it is biologically extremely plausible, based on the contents of what is administered; not to mention the invasive mechanism of injection, which, unlike normal skin grazes and cuts, bypasses important defense levels in the body.

"LOGIC dictates that since doctors are refusing to report cases of adverse events, then we cannot rely on government figures telling us how "rare" these events are supposed to be.

"LOGIC dictates that if senior pharmaceutical executives themselves candidly tell us that 'natural enthusiasm' in the marketing department causes the companies to exaggerate.(i.e. lie).when informing doctors and others about threat and occurrence of disease.(British Medical Jouurnal April 13, 2002), then it is probably true.

"LOGIC dictates that since whenever doctors go on strike the death rate drops, you can't really rely on anything they do or tell you about how to save lives!"

"What about smallpox? Smallpox vaccine doesn't even have smallpox in it. It has cowpox which has not been proven to prevent smallpox. Smallpox was just about eradicated about the time the vaccine was pushed onto the market."

"Mercola.com reports Confirmed! Flu Vaccine INCREASES Risk of Serious Pandemic Flu Illness.(search there for the article)

Hey! Great information above, but what about herd immunity the vaccine pushers talk about?

Half of the people just are too dumb to comprehend that for an unvaccinated to be a threat to the vaccinated means the vaccination does not work. Why aren't this half of people intelligent?

Real hard science has been displaced by the common low consciousness negativities of hysteria and intolerance.

Herd immunity is like saying that eating a healthy diet can really keep you healthy...but only if everyone else is eating the same diet, too. The logic used by the vaccine pushers is flawed on purpose to sell more vaccines, while killing you slowly or quickly in the process. Slowly or quickly depends on how and what poisons are in which vaccines, coupled with the other assaults upon our health most have not thought about and dismissed with the satanic propaganda of 'conspiracy theorist'. 

People think that unvaxxed kids seem to be constantly contagious. Apparently they don't comprehend you can be vaccinated and contagious. You can't spread the disease unless you've been exposed to it.

People are not thinking straight. Many people believe that because a child is vaccinated, they should encounter no threat from the unvaccinated. People need to do research. If we truly have freeness in our country why can we not have a choice of what we want to do with our bodies. Freeness only works if everyone gets to use it. Why, 75 years after the Nazis, are we back into the same flawed thinking as they lived by? Satan knows it worked then, so why not use the same nonsense on stupid people today?

Just what Is The Herd Immunity Theory?
The herd immunity theory was originally coined in 1933 by a researcher named A.W. Hedrich. Hedrich was studying measles patterns in the US between 1900-1931, years before most vaccines were invented to kill people and beginning with the so-called Spanish Flu in 1918. He observed that epidemics of the measles only occurred when less than 68% of children had developed a 'natural immunity' to it. This was based upon the principle that children build their own immunity after suffering with or being exposed to the disease. So the herd immunity theory was, in fact,.about natural disease processes and nothing to do with vaccination. If 68% of the population were allowed to build their own natural defenses, there would be no raging epidemic. Vaccines were invented by evil satan worshippers people to curb natural immunity.

Later on, vaccinologists adopted the phrase 'herd immunity' and increased the figure from 68% to 95% with no scientific justification as to why and then stated that there had to be 95% vaccine coverage to achieve immunity. Essentially, they took Hedrich's study and manipulated it to promote their vaccination programmes.....from MONTHLY ESTIMATES OF THE CHILD POPULATION 'SUSCEPTIBLE' TO MEASLES, 1900-1931, BALTIMORE, MD, AW HEDRICH,.American Journal of Epidemiology, May 1933 – Oxford University Press). Full Text (PDF) available.

Herd immunity doesn't exist and never has. A.W. Hedrich measles observation, was not a study or a research paper and.had nothing to do with VACCINES. His observation was in 1930 and the killed measles vaccine.(the first measles vaccine).wasn't developed until 1963. By 1963, the death rate from measles in the United States had already dropped by approximately 98% according to Vital Statistics of the United States 1937, 1938, 1943, 1944, 1949, 1960, 1967, 1976, 1987, 1992; Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 Part 1; Health, United States, 2004, US Department of Health and Human Services; Vital Records and Health Data Development Section, Michigan Department of Community Health; US Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2003; Reported Cases and Deaths from Vaccine Preventable Diseases, United States, 1950–2008.

Live measles vaccine was distributed in 1966-67. Just on that basis alone antibody production could not be detected.

Herd Immunity has no basis in vaccine induced antibody production, it is not a scientifically validated concept, it is not an immunologic idea, but rather an epidemiological construct and cannot be applied to vaccinated communities because VACCINES were not part of the OBSERVATION.

Despite outbreaks of Pertussis, Mumps and Measles occurring in highly vaccinated populations, some as high as 100%, the CDC and their legion of paid celebrities acting as 'doctors' continue to laud the fake theory of herd immunity. Also take this into consideration: Today millions of adults exist without having had any vaccines in decades.(Baby Boomers).and millions of teenagers who have not had boosters. That is more than half of the country's population. There have not been ANY EPIDEMICS in the USA as a result of more than half of the population being unvaccinated. It's all nonsense to earn money while you are being poisoned to death, slowly or quickly.

I simply don't comprehend why anyone would be concerned with non vaccinated children if they believe vaccines work and their child/children are vaccinated.
***

Your medical information is private and confidential. It is unlawful for Employer(s) to request this information from the Employee or Job Applicant or attach it as precondition to Employment.

Employer asking you to take the jab or you might lose your job?

Print out the information below and hand your employer this letter to fill out. Remember it's not his body, it's yours! And you have your family to protect.

Consider this info too from an excellent Canadian constitutional lawyer, Rocco Galati. It's pretty well made up for you to use and is first-rate.

If anyone in any job or business tries to force a Vaccine, hereis another letter to consicer using Get it to him or her and ask kindly that it be filled out.

I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and apprised of ALL facts before going ahead with any vaccine including one that is in experimental status.

I'd be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements.

1. Can you please advise me of the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?

2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?

3. Can you please advise of the full list of contents of the vaccine you are asking to introduce into my body and if there is any toxicity to the body and if any of the ingredients are derived from aborted fetal tissues?

4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it's introduction?

5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT an 'experimental mRNA gene altering 'therapy' or device containing the highly toxic graphene oxide?

6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?

7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery and why the recovery rate without the jab is markedly higher than after taking the jab?

Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions - namely that:

1. You confirm in writing that I will suffer no harm from what you are recommending.

2. Prerequisite to acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.

3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?

I would also advise that my unalienable rights are reserved.

.
navigation arrow leftnavigation arrow right
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*