.
.
S i t e  S e a r c h

A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ

List of Topics__Ask Suby__Free Stuff__Questions Lists
Terms of Use__________________Privacy Policy

C r e a t i o n  I n d e x

C r e a t i o n  p a g e  2 0

Once complex systems are understood, one can see that any evolutionist saying that man came from a monkey or an ape is tantamount to saying that from a tricycle or bicycle, the motorcycle evolved. "Was it from your grandfather line or grandmother line through whom your descent from a monkey occurred?" is a question that has been asked of evolutionists. But some evolutionists have their own crackpot theory.

Evolution is a developmental process when it comes to many inanimate things. Improvement occurs when R & D.(research and development).leads to further development, but the Creator does things differently.

Development of the telephone had some 3000 failures, the many 'transitional species' of which are in museums. Airplanes had propellers. Modern aircraft use jet engines. Ideas do evolve. Windows 3.1 to 95 to 98 to 2000, ME to XP to Vista to Windows 7 to 8, to 8:1, to Windows 10. Some improvements work better than others. A writer subjects his manuscript to many revisions before publication occurs. High quality ideas come from much thinking over large spans of time involving great effort, unless one is clairvoyant. If the evolution of life.(animate forms).happened on planet Earth, we should see enormity of evidence of transitional improvements. But there is none, apart from the frauds.
   More on design...

One could say that the bicycle was a conceptual.precursor to the space probe, but it certainly would not be a physical precursor.

Darwinian evolution requires physical precursors, yet relies on conceptual precursors. A jet plane can't be turned into a particle collider one nut and one bolt at a time even though both the plane and the collider contain nuts and bolts, washers and pins.

One cannot modify any parts of a tricycle or bicycle and end up with a motorcycle, because a vast gap exists, that of missing complex systems. A bicycle does not have a fossil fuel based propulsion system comprising a motor with pistons, or an electrical system for ignition. One cannot take parts of one irreducibly complex system and use them directly as specialized parts of another irreducibly complex system. For example, it would be silly to take out the motor of a jet plane and its suspension system and attempt to place them directly in an automobile, or vice versa, unless the parts are extensively modified by intention, design and effort. 

One could modify a bicycle to.look like.a motorcycle, but it would still be a bicycle nonetheless. One could say that transportation evolved from a bicycle to a motorcycle, then automobile, airplane, jet plane, rocket, space shuttle and then space probe. This would be true. It is also true that the unformed substance, the quantum 'soup',.evolves into the formed, the invisible to the physical.

AMP:.Even in a 'simple' cell, complex precursors are required in able for it to function. AMP, however, is.very.complicated. Many successive steps are involved in the complicated process to make AMP and the intermediates.(say, A, B and C, with D being AMP for the sake of the example).are not used. 

If A, B and C have no use other than as precursors to D.(AMP, a cell's fuel), what advantage is there to an organism to make just A, B and C? Why the precursors? Why not just make D without the intermediary steps? Yet this is what happens in the production of AMP, an automated complex system involving highly complicated molecules explained on pages 142-149, 157-160 in.Darwin's Black Box. AMP is an important component necessary for DNA manufacture, built from the energy even a 'simple' cell.(organelles).produces. 

If evolution be true, where is the evidence forcing natural selection to take such a circuitous.route? Explanations for this are seldom attempted in evolutionary literature, but, we have one

If creation by God be true, why do some scientists disagree? Some do. Some don't. Here they are.

Some disagree for perhaps this reason:.Romans 1:21 "Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful, but became vain in their imaginations and their foolish heart was darkened.".Many scientists have come to see proofs of God's existence, but then they just carry on as they always have, not letting those things affect them and for various reasons. God never overrides anybody's mindset, so just leaves them alone.

Evolution would have these precursors taken out of the way, being unfit themselves for anything but to ensure the function of D..(is this altruism on a micro scale?).Darwinian evolution relegates them to the death house as it were.

D could not exist without these precursors. But it does exist! The fact that D exists and how it got to exist, instead, relegates Darwinian evolution to the death house

Removing an essential component from a complex system renders the system useless, as useless as the Darwinian 'survival of the fittest' element of his theory. 

In addition to the complexity in these simple processes, A, to be what it is in chemical formulation, requires various enzymes. The binding of AMP causes a scissor like opening in an enzyme, inactivating the enzyme. ATP also involves shut off processes.

You can see the complexity in these few simple processes necessary to produce fuel for a 'simple' cell. How did this pathway develop? What explanation have evolutionary scientists produced to account for these metabolic pathways? None, apart from conceptual.postulations?

DNA being the building blocks of life and requiring AMP, either had to have a way to immediately produce it or obtain it, or it dies. A lottery win requiring six numbers presents horrendous odds for a win to not any particular person. How much greater are the odds involved to win for a specific person? These are the odds faced due to myriad.factors, some of which we discussed here, involved in the cell's 'winning', the subsistence.of life itself.
 


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*