.
.
S i t e  S e a r c h

A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ

List of Topics__Ask Suby__Free Stuff__Questions Lists
Terms of Use__________________Privacy Policy

C r e a t i o n  I n d e x

C r e a t i o n  p a g e  1 9

If we see intelligent purpose, we can be sure it came by design. For example, we can see intelligent purpose in man's designing from raw materials, the components comprising an automobile, computer or space probe. Design involves the purposeful arrangement of parts, evident when a number of separate interacting components are ordered in such a way as to accomplish a function beyond the individual components; such is the atom.

A key question is: What is the identifiable function of a system which requires the greatest amount of the system's internal capacity? For example, a cellular telephone could function as a paper weight. This would be a function for it, but would not allow full use of its purposeful design. And so, some people would have others be their slaves. Man's purpose is far beyond that of a slave to ideas od others whether or not they are good or evil ideas. Nothing averse to willingly helping someone with ideas having promise of benefiting all concerned, but slavery is forced compliance whether it's done by control of money or by sword.

Sometimes we can't know if something has not been designed. For example: the classic movie.The Sting. In it the person being conned had no idea what was happening was designed for his detriment. In 1938 Orson Wells was so real in a radio broadcast, that people actually thought it was news about an attack from outer space. 

Industrial chemists often look to creation in order to design better systems. A new strong glue doctors use comes from having discovered how mussels cling to underwater rocks. By utilizing a protein comprising ten amino acids and adding an enzyme, a powerful new glue creation for bone, wood, metals, etc., provides adhesion in wet environments.

Researchers discover the wonders of fluid dynamics examining the dolphin. Creator-God knows fluid dynamics better than we do. Dolphins were always that way!

Consider the design of the human body. What if instead, the eyes were on the end of the toes? How would you see what to eat? What if waste came out the back of the neck, working against the effect gravity has on intestinal contents? What if you spoke from your lips in the centre of the tummy? Aren't you thankful you were designed as you now appear? And isn't it good!

Consider the mathematics Creator-God used in designing creation. Consider the specialized design of the mole. Consider how science learns from His creation.

Where is the transitional evidence of evolution getting man to as he now appears? The fossil record shows none. Pierre-Paul Grasse, who held the prestigious Chair of Evolution for 30 years at the Sorbonne, wrote."Naturalists must remember that the process of evolution is revealed only through fossil forms. A knowledge of paleontology is, therefore, a prerequisite; only paleontology can provide them with the evidence and reveal its course on mechanisms."....Evolution of Living Organisms 1977 Academic Press, New York.

One will also see as he or she goes along here that no direct route exists to irreducibly complex systems.."The laws of chemistry strongly work against the undirected development of the biochemical systems that make molecules such as AMP.".... Michael Behe.

We see similarity of design, as in insects having wings, as well as birds. This is an evolutionary conundrum. When it is considered by itself away from logically unrelated ideas.(like theropods), the theory of intelligent design is seen to be quite robust, easily answering the argument from imperfection, as with vestiges.

Evolutionists often use syllogisms resulting in non sequitur conclusions, an example of such is 1) A designer would have made the animal without the vestige, 2) The vertebrate has a vestige, 3) therefore, evolution produced the vestige

Evolutionary scientists today elicit errors similar to their 18th century counterparts, yet with thinking right out of the 1200s.(Ockham's principle restated by Newton), in that, many sheepishly admit no more causes of natural things than such as are sufficient to explain their appearance. Too bad they weren't students in Ron Glasberg's class.

Evolutionists deal qualitatively using conjectural procedures.(what are the similar qualities in our observations and given these, what seems a plausible explanation for their existence).for explanations regarding a complex organism's wholeness. However, quantitative measurements are always needed in accounting for complex functions.

Evolutionists increase their errors when they use analogies to describe how complex biological systems might have been produced in a Darwinian fashion. Their analogies are often in lieu of actual evidence of this occurring. 

Analogies always are set up so that they either explicitly or.(more frequently).implicitly propose that A is like B in a restricted subset of properties. To reach a conclusion based on an analogy, it is only necessary that the deduction flow out of the shared properties, a computer is like a toaster in that they both have cords to connect them to a power source. A cell is like a watch in that they both keep time; the cells pacing the heart. An alligator is like a duck in that they both use their feet as paddles in water for motion. Similar thinking appears in evolutionary writings.
   


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*