.
S
i t e S e a r c h
A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ
List
of Topics__Ask
Suby__Free
Stuff__Questions
Lists
Terms
of Use__________________Privacy
Policy
C
r e a t i o n I n d e x
C r e a t i o n
p a g e
1 9
If we see
intelligent
purpose, we can be sure it came by design. For example, we can see intelligent
purpose in man's designing from raw materials, the components comprising
an automobile, computer or space probe. Design involves the purposeful
arrangement of parts, evident when a number of separate interacting components
are ordered in such a way as to accomplish a function beyond the individual
components; such is the
atom.
A key question is: What
is the identifiable function of a system which requires the greatest amount
of the system's internal capacity? For example, a cellular telephone could
function as a paper weight. This would be a function for it, but would
not allow full use of its purposeful design. And so, some people would
have others be their slaves. Man's purpose is far beyond that of a
slave to ideas od others whether or not they are good or evil ideas. Nothing
averse
to willingly helping someone with ideas having promise of benefiting
all concerned, but slavery is forced compliance
whether it's done by control of money or by sword.
Sometimes we can't know
if something has not been designed. For example: the classic movie.The
Sting. In it the individual being conned
had no idea what was happening, was designed for his detriment.
In 1938 Orson Wells was so real in a radio broadcast, that people actually
thought it was news about an attack from outer space..The
Sting.teaches
one to be alert, as there are truths out there used to suck you into some
kinds of tricks that are cons. Be careful:.Proverbs
11:14 "Where no counsel is, the people fall, but in the multitude of
counsellors there is safety."
Industrial chemists often
look to creation in
order to design better systems. A new strong glue doctors use comes
from having discovered how mussels
cling to underwater rocks. By utilizing a protein comprising ten amino
acids and adding an enzyme,
a powerful new glue creation for bone, wood, metals, etc., provides adhesion
in wet environments.
Researchers discover the
wonders of fluid dynamics examining the
dolphin. Creator-God knows fluid dynamics better than we do. Dolphins
were always that way!
Consider the design of the
human body. What if instead, the eyes were on the end of the toes? How
would you see what to eat? What if waste came out the back of the neck,
working against the effect gravity has on intestinal contents? What if
you spoke from your lips in the centre of the tummy? Aren't you thankful
you were designed as you now appear? And isn't
it good!
Consider
the
mathematics Creator-God used in designing creation. Consider the
specialized design of the mole. Consider how science
learns from His creation.
Where is the transitional
evidence of evolution getting man to as he now appears? The fossil record
shows none. Pierre-Paul Grasse, who held the prestigious
Chair of Evolution for 30 years at the Sorbonne,
wrote."Naturalists
must remember that the process of evolution is revealed only through fossil
forms. A knowledge of paleontology
is, therefore, a prerequisite;
only paleontology can provide them with the evidence and reveal its course
on mechanisms."....Evolution
of Living Organisms 1977 Academic Press, New York.
One will also see as he
or she goes along here that no direct route exists to irreducibly
complex systems.."The
laws of chemistry strongly work against the undirected development of the
biochemical systems that make molecules
such as AMP."....
Michael
Behe.
We see similarity
of design, as in insects having wings, as well as birds.
This is an evolutionary conundrum.
When it is considered by itself away from logically
unrelated ideas.(like
theropods),
the theory of intelligent design is seen to be quite robust,
easily answering the argument
from imperfection, as with vestiges.
Evolutionists often use
syllogisms
resulting in non
sequitur conclusions, an example of such is 1) A designer would have
made the animal without the vestige,
2) The vertebrate
has a vestige, 3) therefore, evolution produced the vestige.
Evolutionary scientists
today elicit
errors similar to their 18th century counterparts,
yet with thinking right out of the 1200s.(Ockham's
principle restated by Newton),
in that, many sheepishly admit no more causes of natural things than such
as are sufficient to explain their appearance. Too bad they weren't students
in
Ron Glasberg's class.
Evolutionists deal
qualitatively
using conjectural
procedures.(what
are the similar qualities in our observations and given these, what seems
a plausible
explanation for their existence).for
explanations regarding a complex organism's wholeness. However,
quantitative
measurements are always needed in accounting for complex functions.
Evolutionists increase their
errors when they use analogies
to describe how complex biological systems might have been produced in
a Darwinian fashion. Their analogies are often in lieu
of actual evidence of this occurring.
Analogies always are set
up so that they either explicitly
or.(more
frequently).implicitly
propose that A is like B in a restricted subset
of properties. To reach a conclusion based on an analogy, it is only necessary
that the deduction
flow out of the shared properties, a computer is like a toaster in that
they both have cords to connect them to a power source. A cell is like
a watch in that they both keep time; the cells pacing the heart. An alligator
is like a duck in that they both use their feet as paddles in water for
motion.
Similar
thinking appears in evolutionary writings.
