i t e S e a r c h
r e a t i o n I n d e x
C r e a t i o n
p a g e 2 7
Electromagnetism gives atoms
their powerful chemical properties at close ranges, especially their positively
and the negatively charged electron.
If the balance of the electromagnetic force altered in.any.way,
their chemistry would disintegrate.
There would be no stars, no planets and no life!
The electromagnetic force
fixes the chemical structure of matter and makes positive and negative
electric changes attract. Without that we would miss a lot more than our
cellular phones, radios and TV. Aren't you glad Creator-God designed it
to work so well? Man, in his wildest dreams couldn't even begin to approach
this kind of astonishing integrated complexity and end up with it all working!
Exactly equal to the magnetizing
force is the magnetization of a substance in the opposite direction.(diamagnetism).
Diamagnetism is the property that certain substances have of being repelled
by both poles of a magnet and hence taking a position at right
angles to the magnet's line of influence.
Established physical theories
cannot predict a value for the cosmological
constant which measures the
gravitational repulsion of empty space.."Many
theoretical physicists find themselves forced to seek a timeless description
of the Universe, as they recognize that the usual notions
of space break down near the Big Bang."....New
Scientist, October 16, 1999, page 31.
The Universe looks so much
the same over vast distances, except
for our solar system.
The background radiation
is remarkably constant in space and the Earth
is bombarded by it with astonishing uniformity of intensity, indicating
the entire Universe started at the same temperature. Temperature
and density are uniform across the Universe, yet there simply was no
way for distant parts of the Universe to communicate with one another and
reach an identical temperature unless all
The Universe appears flat,
that is, the overall structure of space/time
has little if any curvature. We exist in the eternity of that which
was determined to be our present physical existence; our recent physical
past being but a memory and the future, a dream. Where
is the past and the future if it's all a hologram?
time there were few fossil finds. Today, about 160 years later, we
have over a quarter of a million of them.(*).
What about the fossil discovery
of our 'human ancestors', the Australopithecus
then Homo erectus.(Java
The search for our 'human ancestors' has been one filled with dishonest
science and wishful thinking.
New finds shed more doubtful
lights on evolution's messy history. Meave Leakey, Palentologist, discovered
fossils in Africa that show that Homo habilis, which according to prior
thinking of evolutionists, evolved into Homo erectus, which in turn evolved
into Homo sapiens.(humans).
He found that no evolution occurred. Instead he says that they were
living side by side together. His and his collegues' findings were published
in the journal.Nature.(nature.com)
Solly Zuckerman, M.A., M.D., D. Science.(anatomy).in.Beyond
the Ivory Tower, Taplinger Pub. Co., New York, 1970, p. 64, is one
of Britain's most influential scientists, yet he also regards much of the
fossil evidence for human evolution as nonsense.
Zuckerman has subjected key
fossils to years of biometrics
testing and declares that the idea that they walked and ran upright is
wishful thinking. He remarked on the record of reckless speculation
in the field of human origins."For
example, no scientist could logically.dispute
that man, without having been involved in any act of divine creation, evolved
from some ape like creature in a very short space of time—speaking in geological
terms—without leaving any fossil traces of the steps of the transformation.
...As I have already implied,
students of fossil primates have not been distinguished for caution when
working within the logical constrains
of their subject. The record is so astonishing
that it is legitimate
to ask whether much science is yet to be found in this field at all."
Piltdown man; look it up in a dictionary. It was a hoax,
like the adaptive
moths and now apparently, the theropods.
Although not right regarding some
things, at least I haven't noticed Creationists using delusive
methods as some evolutionists have used, whose tactics
have done discredit to science.
are so involved in figuring out how evolution works, they have no time
to pursue answers to the question of whether evolution was even true in
the first place.
Did you know that you could
call any anthropological museum on the face of this planet and ask them
if they have one.......just one transitional fossil.(a
fossil between plant and animal, or animal to man, or even from one species
of animal to another species).and
they will all tell you no? There has never, since the beginning
of time been one transitional fossil found anywhere. Now don't you think
that if we'd been around for billions or even millions of years, taking
into account that there are literally millions of other fossils in museums
all over the world, that we'd have at least one transitional fossil to
show as evidence for this evolution theory? One would think so. But there
are none. And what the Lebanese
desert shows is most inteesting.
Parker, university professor:."Like
most Americans, I was mistaught in grade school that it takes millions
of years and tremendous heat and pressure to turn sediments.(like
sand, lime, or clay).into
sandstone, limestone or shale).."Surprisingly
enough, just about everybody, creationist, evolutionist and everyone in
between, agrees that individual fossil specimens themselves begin to form
very, very rapidly! Most fossils are formed when a plant or animal is quickly
and deeply buried, out of reach of scavengers and currents, usually in
mud, lime or sand sediment rich in cementing minerals that harden and preserve
at least parts of the dead creatures...The ideal conditions for forming
most fossils and fossil bearing rock layers are flood conditions. The debate
is just whether it was many 'little floods' over a long time, or mostly
the one big Flood of Noah's time.(*)..In
fact, until Darwin's theory came along, most educated laymen and scientists,
including the founding fathers of geology, assumed that fossils were the
remains of plants and animals buried in Noah's Flood. If a plant or animal
just dies and falls to the ground or into the water, it's quickly broken
up and decomposed by scavengers, wind and water currents, even Sunlight.(*).
"Fallen logs, road kills
and dead aquarium fish do not just become fossils, nor did the millions
of bison slaughtered in America's move West. Although professionals understand
how fast fossils begin to form under flood conditions, the general public
often does not. I was on a radio talk show one time when a caller said
he believed the Earth had to be fantastically old because he'd seen west,
as I have, huge logs turned to stone in Arizona's Petrified Forest. Surely,
he said, it would take millions of years to turn a log six feet.(2m).across
into solid stone! So I asked him to think about it. If a tree fell over
in a forest or into a lake or stream and just lay there for millions of
years, wouldn't it just rot away? Bugs, termites, fungus, chemical action
would soon turn it back into dust. But if that tree got suddenly and deeply
buried in mineral rich sediment, then minerals could crystallize throughout
the log and turn it to stone before it had time to decay. To my encouragement,
he replied "You know, I believe you're right about that!
"A museum in central Tasmania
has a 'fossil hat' on display. A miner had dropped his felt hat and the
limey water had turned it into a 'hard hat', which the curator was kind
enough to let me feel and photograph. That same process, mineral infill,
can turn wood, bones and shells into fossils in a short period of time.
Indeed, fossils can be made in the laboratory!
"Remember the Precambrian
Australian jellyfish? Jellyfish often wash ashore, but in a matter of hours
they have turned into nondescript 'blobs', although watch out as the stinging
cells continue to work for quite a while!
"To preserve the markings
and detail of the Ediacara jellyfish, the organisms seem to have landed
on a wet sand that acted as a natural cement. The sand turned to sandstone
before the jellyfish had time to rot, preserving the jellyfishes' markings,
somewhat as you can preserve your hand print if you push it into cement
during that brief time when it's neither too wet nor too dry. Indeed, the
evolutionist who discovered the Ediacara jellyfish said the fossils must
have formed in less than 24 hours. He didn't mean one jellyfish in 24 hours;
he meant millions of jellyfish and other forms had fossilized throughout
the entire Ediacara formation, which stretches about 300 miles or 500 km
from South Australia into the Northern Territory, in less than 24 hours!
In short, floods form fossils fast!"....from
Facts of Life, 1994, Master Books.
J. Gould, Harvard University and Niles
Eldredge, American Museum of Natural History,
the higher level of evolutionary transition.(macroevolution),
has always been in trouble. ...Smooth intermediates between bauplane.(basically
different types of creatures).are
almost impossible to construct, even in thought experiments; there is certainly
no evidence in the fossil record; curious mosaics like
do not count. Darwin did wrestle brilliantly and triumphantly with the
product of adaption,
but he had limited success with the issue of diversity,
even though he titled his book with reference to his relative failure,
Origin Of Species."....The
Confusion Over Evolution, Stephen J. Gould, New York Review of Books,
November 19, 1992, page 54.