.
.
S i t e  S e a r c h

A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ

List of Topics__Ask Suby__Free Stuff__Questions Lists
Terms of Use__________________Privacy Policy

C r e a t i o n  I n d e x

C r e a t i o n  p a g e  2 8

And let us not get too far into why some evolutionists embrace reincarnation.

To show how wacky this confused world is: If reincarnation is true, how can evolution be true? One deals with a spirit component coming into man. The other is effective toward those unquestioning souls who mostly refrain from spiritual considerations.

Charles Darwin, letter quoted in Desmond and Moore, 1991, page 553.."It is an awful stretcher to believe that a peacock's tail was thus formed.(by evolutionary methods); but believing it.(and so begins the religion of evolution), I believe in the same principle modified, applied to man.".Dear Darwin, a sincere man, wanted so much that the road he was on proved true.

Richard Goldschmidt,.The Material Basis of Evolution."The major evolutionary advances must have taken place.(somewhere).in large steps. The many missing links in the paleontological record are sought for in vain because they have never existed."

The earliest fossil birds like archaeopteryx were highly distinctive, having wings and the ability to fly. Doesn't the fossil record show that these creatures slowly evolved into existence, instead of suddenly appearing? At their first appearance in the fossil record, there were already a number of different lineages. So, they obviously didn't evolve. It's just another name for birds, of which we have plenty of fossils but no transitional ones. To carry on the ridiculousness even further, how about dinosaurs growing feathers, turning into birds and flying? This latest concoction in the evolutionary realm is called theropods, showing the height of idiocy has been attained.

The fossil evidence demonstrates life exploded into existence on Earth, instead of slowly evolving. The fossil record shows us that whatever happened occurred quickly. Completely formed bacterial.cells.(single celled prokaryotic organisms).are believed to have appeared soon after the 3.5 billion years ago some scientists think the Earth was originally formed. They are just as they are today. Trilobites play a key part.

Most people are unaware that Darwin's strongest opponents were.not clergymen, but fossil experts.

If evolution be true, why does its supposed evidence work in reverse? Why does a newly discovered fossil named 'Jobaria tiguidensis', evidence a simpler structure, only 12 vertebrae, a simple neck and tail structure as compared to its predecessors.(Diplodous and Apatosaurus).of supposed millions of years? 

According to Dr. Jeff Wilson, University of Michigan and Dr. Paul Serena of the University of Chicago."When they died.(Diplodous and Apatosaurus), they were preserved by a flash flood."

Darwin admitted.(and even thought that way too for some time).that the state of the fossil evidence was full of such intermediate links?.(*)

Continuing with Darwin.(from top of page):."Geology surely does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain and this perhaps is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory and because of the fossil evidence, all the most eminent paleontologists and all our greatest geologists, have unanimously, often.vehemently, maintained that the.species do not change.".In fact what it does reveal.poses more problems for evolutionary theory.

In spite of this information, modern day evolutionists plug along with vain hopes a continued search for their 'hopeful monster' will reveal clues in support of the evolutionary stance. Phillip Gingerich and Hans Thewissen, University of Michigan paleontologists found in 1994, what they strongly purport to be three intermediate species; one a whale that walks..(he must have gone to the same school as Professor Jones)

They claim this documents the evolution of cetaceans.(whales, porpoises, etc.).from terrestrial.(earthly).mammals. They feel the skeletal remains establish that the animal could move easily, both on land and in water. Hmmm! Just like the crocodiles and alligators today, huh! And arrived at after perhaps similar observation as to that which attempted to establish Lucy

The fossil record is marked by two great principles: 1) stasis, which means that most species are unchanged in all their documented history; the way they look when they appear in the fossil record is the way they look when the fossil record is over. They have not changed. 2) sudden appearance, which means that in any local area, a species does not arise gradually, but appears all at once, fully formed.

The Bighorn Basin in Wyoming contains a continuous record of fossil deposits for what geologists say is 5 million years. Because this record is so complete, paleontologists assumed that a positive trail of evolution could be found. Instead, the fossil record does not convincingly document a single transition from one species to another.

Evolutionist Niles Eldredge writes."We paleontologists have said that the history of life (in the fossil record) supports the story.(gradual evolution), all the while knowing that it does not."

Phillip Johnson:."If evolution means the gradual change of one kind of organism into another kind, the outstanding characteristic of the fossil record is the.absence of evidence for evolution."

The fossil record totally rejects the idea of millions of tiny changes. The quick leaps are a way of attributing miraculous power to chance or nature. While admiring the faith of those who believe in such hopeful monsters, it seems far more rational to believe in a wise creating God.


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*