.
S
i t e S e a r c h
A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ
List
of Topics__Ask
Suby__Free
Stuff__Questions
Lists
Terms
of Use__________________Privacy
Policy
C
r e a t i o n I n d e x
C r e a t i o n
p a g e 8 4 b
Darwin
talked a lot about the excellency of design, attributing this of course,
to the supportive tenets
of his theory. He talked little of any intelligence regarding the diversity
of species,
preferring instead, I would presume,
to allow assumptions
based on everything else he talked of.
Darwin starts with life existing
and leaves alone how life came to be. How can Darwin even begin to talk
of origins with any semblance
of accuracy when he starts with existing life? Right from the 'get go'
we see conjecture.
I mean when you start with origins of something as important as life and
avoid delving
into it further, one is left with wondering just where the animating
energy called life came from. Darwin's approach was beat from the start.
But he kept on and it just got worse from there.
Many evolutionists attribute
built
in programming causing reactions and changes, to proof of evolutionary
theory. They seem as blind as Darwin was. Changes observed due to genetic
detours and shortcuts like plasmids,
prions,
retroviruses
and transposons
are pounced upon as evolutionary
proofs; with many even adhering to the outdated fraud
of the peppered moth:."The
rise and fall of melanism
in the peppered moth was.unquestionably.a
Darwinian event, brought about by natural selection acting on random mutations.",
not realizing that a moth has no way to alter its color over its period
of existence and can't figure out if making such a change would in any
way be advantageous. Furthermore,
it
couldn't transmit any of its supposed color changes anyhow, as it can't
adjust its color.
The peppered
moth fraud...
Diehard evolutionists like
Steve
Jones, continue treating evolution's terminal condition with antiquated.remedial.topical
ointments.(misapplied
adaption.{the
tagging of changes within a species [like
the finch] to evolutionary concepts}, gradualism,
natural
selection,
random mutations,
survival
of the fittest, etc.).including
new terms like coevolution
and various conjectures
such as 'pseudosaurs';
false paleontological
links such as
Archaeopteryx
and theropods;
ludicrous.postulations
such as punctuated
equilibria;
psychologically.maladjusted.concoctions
like ontogeny
recapitulates phylogeny and phylogenic;
Out and out frauds regardingprehistory,
so the term 'phrauds' for 'frauds regarding prehistories;
phrauds like Nebraskaman
and Nebraskawoman, Piltdown man, Peppered
Moths,
Lucy
and her relatives, other evolutionary 'supports' including Neanderthal
man and 'human'
ancestors Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus africanus, Homo
habilis, then Homo Erectus.(Java
man), etc.
