-Radiocarbon 14 Dating:.For the ages to be valid, the amount of radioactive carbon 14 in the atmosphere must have always been constant. Carbon 14 is produced by cosmic rays smashing into nitrogen atoms near the top of the Earth's atmosphere. If the intensity of cosmic radiation.was different in the distant past, then the C-14 dating system will be in error.1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8).

Also."Contributing to errors in radio carbon dating is the ground water problem; that is, it seeps into fossilized bones causing the proteins to break down more quickly than they would otherwise, washing out the resulting amino acids and generally playing havoc with a steadily ticking clock. The 70,000 year date was found to be off by 63,000 years."....The Neanderthal Enigma.

Because of errors in measuring.(7 methods of radiocarbon dating).radiocarbon-14, dates are calibrated.(check, adjust, compare with a standard).against calendar dates for Egyptian tomb artifacts and construction dates recorded in early local texts.

Then there was the story of a man whose tree was hit by lightning, who took a piece of that wood in to be dated. The age for his five year old tree's piece of wood was established to be approximately two hundred thousand years ago.

This is only one.type.of radiometric.(a measurement on an instrument called a radiometer that detects electromagnetic radiation).dating. Of the seven methods of radiometric dating, there are no easy.(say, accurate).methods of directly dating fossils or even the sedimentary rocks which may hold them.

Plants take in carbon dioxide gas from the atmosphere and incorporate it into their tissues. Some of that carbon dioxide contains the radioactive isotope of carbon.(14C or carbon 14). This decays at a known rate, so elapsed time can be measured since the plant died, one half of the radioactive isotope decays at 5,730 years. Carbon 14 persists in decaying after the death of an organism, so once discovered, a part of the discovered fossil can be burned to transform it into CO₂ where detectors of radiation count the electron emission that occurs as the CO₂ decays into nitrogen. The amount of C-14 is referenced to stable carbon, C-12, to conclude how much decay has occurred, thus dating the fossil.

-Radiometric Dating Methods:.Regular rates of decay for radioactive elements were found in the Earth's rocks.

Radiometric dating techniques are established using constant rates of isotope decay. Once an isotope is added to a growing mineral crystal, decay begins at a steady rate, showing forth products eliciting time intervals. These are the clocks in rocks geologists use to measure time.

Some main dating approaches apply, of which radiocarbon-14 and potassium-argon are two of the radiometric methods. Radiometric dating methods can only be used on previously molten.(liquid).rock such as lava or granite. 

-Random events:.Random events.(in evolution defined as natural selection acting upon random mutations).cannot produce near perfect adaptation by means of sequential variations.

Evolution is disorder in disguise, being a blend of randomness and determinism, somewhat like the Roman God Janus.(door and gateway God), who had two heads looking in opposite directions, that of, randomness, being not sure in which direction she should go and determinism, sure that she should be going somewhere. The entire legal systems of the world show this idiocy along wityh the educational systems.

Randomness or chance, can actually account for nothing. When it comes to the slight chance evolution may be correct, we reach the impossible realm. Thusly, randomness and determinism can be transvalued as deterministic.chaos. 

The concept of randomness is another evolutionary argument from silence; that is, an argument based on the silence of there being no.facts to support it, instead being a combination of conjecturable.concoctions. Rather, we are all connected.(free viewing of the movie.The Connected Universe, about the greatest discovery in quantum physics in 150 years).to the patterns of intelligence.(example).of the universe. All is connected to everything else. No randomness. No chaos. Just one pattern moving into another, as when you the baby is now you the adult. Invisible energy is highly organized and mathematically intricate as it changes form into something other than what it was.

The creator of the Periodic Table Of Elements and others, discovered no randomness.

Some of the ideas facing the direction toward determinism are here.

Johnny von Neumann, mathematician,.(claimed by others to be brighter than Einstein and on a par with.Ramanujan), believed with other mathematicians that there is a pattern to randomness, that all is essentially ordered. Randomness is therefore really the lack of understanding the pattern supported by the invisible.

Once the pattern is understood, the concept of randomness disappears and with it any matters that may rely upon it. And Stephen Wolfram is well on his way towards intelligently comprehending this concept.

There can be no formal proof that a string of species has resulted from randomness because there is no assurance that complexity or the invisible, has been accounted for in evolution. Therefore evolution invalidates itself and shows itself to be the product of either ignorance or sly.deception.

Darwin perceived.symmetry and sought a cause that could not be quantified. He was honest enough to admit he had trouble with his theory. Those who later hijacked his theory as part of a ploy to dumb down people were not high quality persons like Darwin. 

Throughout this entire dissertation the pattern of creation, the mosaic of life, has become readily evident, eliminating natural selection's randomness and thus, the theory of evolution becomes simply an antiquated.dictum. It can thus be said that ignorance of pattern spawns randomness. Does this mean Darwin's random processes have no definitive direction because they are ignorant blind processes?

One cause of ignorance is lack of interest. Another is lack of time to accurately arrive at quantitatively.verifiable information. This is really the randomness, that being our on again, off again approach, our hit and miss stabs at acquiring information, again, I think, mostly due to lack of time, because most people must surely be interested in how we got here and why we are here.

Evolution is an attempt.(I say an 'attempt', as evolution, being really anti knowledge, presents an illusion of power to effect change, when it is simply bluster).at intensification.of chance; that is, if evolutionists can increase that intensity.(increasing the possibilities), then weight is added to what evolutionists have decided to believe.

.