i t e S e a r c h
do it; that is, they move from true science that may threaten their postulations,
randomness, settling upon what they feel is an axiomatic.(self
of design as the only possibility.(necessary
of course, in order to replace foundational creation precepts
with evolutionary concepts),
thus placing themselves into the preposterous.realm
of circular reasoning.
r e a t i o n I n d e x
C r e a t i o n
P a g e 1 0
Neo-Darwinism is based on
Evolutionary theory is driven by natural selection due to environmental
pressures, the process eliminating
the least stable structures, those less adapted to a given environment.
selection will never produce in a being any structure more injurious
than beneficial to that being, for natural selection acts solely by and
for the good of each.(*).
As natural selection works solely for the good of each being, all corporeal
and mental endowments will tend
to progress toward perfection." Surprisingly
in this, he was correct.if.he
meant genes, but he.probably.knew
nothing of them back then, as the science of genetics
didn't come on stream till 1900, thanks to the work of the Austrian monk
Mendel in 1866, whose work was widely ignored until 1900. And he was
'out to lunch' regarding his phrase 'progress toward perfection', because
the supposed natural selection tenet
of his theory had favor to mutations. Why
this was no good.
because of the basic.tenets
of the evolutionary theory, an increasing number of scientists.(what
of them had to say).believe,
fails to qualify as a theory. If all the violence, hate, sickness and
disease are what billions
of years of evolution have brought us, it must then be the world's
biggest failure. Those who espouse
it in continued hope, in the light of evidence to the contrary,
show evidence of serious psychological.maladjustment.
Evolution can now be seen to be nothing more than a fantasy
filled fabrication of illogical.fallacy.
Once thoroughly examined it can be seen evolution has reached an epistemological
Evolution is silent on what
it is that formats.an
organism's blueprint. Evolution fails to account for how the living
material of a developing life form knows both how and what to unfold. Evolution
fails to account for how organisms regulate and control their growth systems.
Evolution fails to account for the harmony
that is in various organisms and fails to explain why should there be any
harmony at all. Evolution also miserably fails to account for the mathematical
precision organisms exhibit. It also fails to account for the spirit
in man without which evolutionists couldn't even reason
with the error prone
information they possess.
Evolution also fails to account
for the complex biological processes spurred
by the cell. Evolution fails to account
for the ability of a cell to communicate what goes where. Where does the
heart go in a developing embryo,
brain, the ears, the
eyes, the hands,
legs, etc.? How much and what type of nutrition is necessary for each
component as growth progresses? How is it apportioned?
Evolution fails to account for properties of matter that do what they do
where it is that they are doing it. Though evolution talks of phenotypes,
it here fails too, in an accounting for them. Modern day evolution fails
to account for how genes.are
turned off and on. Evolution fails to account for the
dynamics of an ecosystem. Evolution even fails criteria.to
be accounted worth being classified as a theory.
selection is an essential part of Darwinian theory, this mysterious,
in action natural selection energy, is believed by evolutionists to be
the ultimate source of genetic variation.(talk
about their faith, eh!).
One problem with the adaption
by evolutionists to be due to natural
selection acting upon random
of the theory, is that the majority of mutations.(999
out of every 1000).are
harmful; for example, Down's Syndrome, etc. Yet are we expected to accept
facto, that the myriad.mutations
necessary to produce the complex healthy, well adapted structures we see
everywhere evident in life, were mostly helpful towards this end? Fact
is, mutations aren't heritable beyond one generation. Somehow they
missed this, however the smarter ones simply adapted this to be, new mutations
occurring in future generations and assumed this would be an important
mechanism for improving a species adaption
at future times. But again they missed
A non complex life form
is an impossibility as one of the requirements of life is that it needs
to have the ability to reproduce. A simple self-reproducing organism, Mycoplasma
comprised of 482 genes with 580,000 'letters' or base
pairs. But even this little creature is not sustainable on its own.
It parasitizes complex organisms to survive.
Did Darwin ascribe
to some other science of
than we today are aware of? The adaption concept
is recognized as a fallacy.
Evolutionists today know
a lot, except why a hen's egg doesn't turn into a crocodile! Darwin knew
little regarding mutations. What good is it to have a lot of knowledge
about that which is useless and erroneous?
It's just a waste of energy.
the phrase 'Origin
of Species', Darwin said nothing about why members of different species
are usually mutually
reproduce between species), like the
American, December, 1999, page 66.
Evolutionists know little
of complexity in nature as they focus upon such simple fables as natural
give some complexity for minds too long assuming the random occurrence
nature, such as crystals and snowflakes, provides insight into the generation
repetitive, high information).
One objection to evolution
is that it's too slow for this age, or, to put it another way; The Infinite
One's cooperative design is just too
too integrated, too
efficient and too complex
for the hackneyed.banality
cranks out in meagre
attempts to compensate
questions regarding origins with conjecture.
Either evolution happened
slowly, with each tiny change building on the last over 'jillions'
of years or the changes came as quick leaps.(and
faster with the new crackpot adaptations to the theory),
something like a mouse coming out of a snake's egg.