Typical of such.idiotic.jargon.regarding
the flying squirrel:."It
was a simple evolutionary step to change a leap into a glide by developing
a web of skin between the body and legs." ...Encyclopedia
of Mammals, 1998, Academic Press, San Diego, California, page 29. Yeah,
right! And it's just as 'simple' to change Evil Kneivel's canyon leaping
motorcycle into a glider plane. Get real! There are more fairy stories
out there with reference to the flimsy
theory of evolution than one can shake a stick at! Are those who write
this stuff really that stupid or are they influenced, intimidated
and paid by those
wanting to dumb down people?
Complexity
theory.proposes
that many features of living systems are the result of self-organization
and not natural selection, that is, a large number of interacting components
spontaneously
organized themselves into ordered patterns. The complexity of a system
is shown in the tasks it does.."Complexity
theory and symbiosis
are alternatives to Darwinian gradualism, but do not explain the fundamental
biochemical machines of life."....Michael
Behe. Behind the 'self-organization' is the
master mind of mathematical design.
Evolution theory fails to
convincingly.take
into account an organism's programmed changes over time, such
as...
Molecular.(existing
between
molecules).biochemistry.(the
branch of chemistry that deals with plants and animals and their life processes).and
biophysics.(the
branch of physics
that deals with living matter).are
what has been used in attempting to determine a plausible
answer to the age old question, how did life come to be as it is today?
The creation was finished
but its maintenance is ongoing:.Hebrews
4:3 "...the works were finished from the foundation of the world."
Even your body renews all
its cells every two years and begins immediately to again create any damaged
and/or missing cells when you have cut yourself. On the Creator's side,
all tends toward
life. Well then,
how
come the same wrinkles and scars? Matter is not prevented from emerging.from
nothing.
Darwin,
controverting
the law of entropy,
saw creation as an ongoing process distributed over eons
of time in the past and into the future, producing new species.
Through metabolism
the body breaks up and breaks down substances through chemical processes.
Using X-ray
crystallography and nuclear
magnetic resonance, biochemists are able to determine the underlying
processes that form and maintain life.
Biochemistry reveals the
staggeringly complicated processes required to produce vision..Here
Darwin was correct. To understand a function, it is necessary to understand
every step in the process. Automotive engineers would agree with that.
They don't design functions such as brakes and not understand every step
in the process. Computer engineers and astrophysicists
too! So do mathematical, nuclear, rocket and other professional
scientists who believe in using numbers and quantities to support their
explanations, as opposed to verbalists
having a preference for story telling. One becomes mathematically provable;
the other conceptualism.
Steve Kauffman of the Santa
Fe Institute sums it up:."In
order to function at all, a metabolism
must minimally be a connected series of catalyzed.transformations
leading from food to needed products. Conversely, however, without the
connected web to maintain the flow of energy and products, how could there
have been a living entity
to evolve connected metabolic pathways?" Kauffman's
mathematical analysis in his.The
Origins of Order, 1993 Oxford University Press, New York, argues that
the origins of life, metabolism, genetic programs and body plans,
are
all beyond Darwinian explanations.
Symbiosis
theory can't explain the ultimate origins of complex systems. Symbiosis
is the joining of two separate cells, or two separate systems, both of
which are already functioning.
Big Bang theory:.No
theory can explain why the multiverse
is such that a big bang even occurred;
could
it have? The known laws of physics obviate
the idea of it. Why would creation start from some kind of a destruction?
It makes no sense that a good God would use destruction to produce good
and beauty. Go and blow up an old car in a junk yard in hopes of producing,
say, a razor that shaves off hair. Keep blowing the junk up and see if
you get anything of utility
and design.
Evolution used as commonly
taught, being an explanation for the origin of the organisms of life, has
many
flaws. But, it should be taught because something
can be learned from its idiocy.
Any scientist
espousing
the Big Bang Theory obviously fails to comprehend both the importance
of water and the astounding complexity of mechanical design exhibited
by quarks; not
to mention the complexities involved in trying to reconcile the Inflation
theory, the enigma
of dark matter and these imponderables,
such as consciousness, memory,
feelings,
emotions,
laughter,
waves
becoming particles, etc.
What are called quarks,
gravitons,
etc.
are all just different vibrations of the unified
field.
The multiverse
is infinite
in what we can see and seemingly infinite on the small scale too.(quantum),
with another new subatomic particle having been discovered in Illinois's
Fermilab atom smasher. Fermilab's Tevatron will soon produce 16 billion
times a billion anti electrons a year. They have now created new, what
we call, particles.(news.nationalgeographic.com).
But, humanity has also been doing that for ages with the mind God gave
us. What about that?
According to the current
expansion rate and the mass density, the Universe is believed to be about
twelve billion years old, but it's only old according to how we measure
time in things. These measurements could be off if what we assume to be
constants were varying, for example, the red
shifts.
Evolutionists have said that
the discovery of radiation
left over from the fireball of creation has confirmed the Big Bang origin.
If the Earth was formed
by the BB and again, it may
have been, why is there no place on the Earth, or within the Earth,
where a collection of a sample would elict
the composition
of the entire planet?
If an explosion occurred,
wherewith
gravity, making.the
Sun a sucker.(the
Poynting-Robertson Effect)? So many
questions and there will always be:.Ecclesiastes
3:11 "...he has set the world in their heart, so that no man can find
out the work that God makes from the beginning to the end."
Furthermore,
dark
matter.differs
from.anything.here,
us and the Earth and all on it and all in the physical universe. Dark matter
is the commonest
stuff in the Universe.(word
'universe' means 'whole', one verse, one symphony).
If the BB was true and if dark matter came from it, how then come us? We
humans are made of other unusual stuff.
Another
conundrum:
There is at least 10 times more helium
in the Universe than could have been made in the
stars.
Theoretical physicist John
Polkington, one of the key players in proving the quark
structure of matter, now serves Creator-God as a minister. He states in
his book.In
An Age Of Science."...science
and theology are intellectual cousins pursuing parallel inquiries."....World
and I, July, 2000.
