.
.
S i t e  S e a r c h

A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ

List of Topics__Ask Suby__Free Stuff__Questions Lists
Terms of Use__________________Privacy Policy

P r o o f  o f  t h e  B i b l e  T h e o m a t i c s
p a g e  6

Matching the Results with Random Values
In order to perform any objective and scientific investigation, both the procedure and end results must be: (1) definable, (2) testable, (3) the tests repeatable, and (4) the outcome predictable.

There must be absolute ground rules that eliminate as much as possible, any human factor. Various classifications must be pinned down and identified in advance of performing any tests. There can be no accusations of bias or arbitrary manipulation of data, entering into the tests. Private wishes must not be allowed to cook the results of the inquiry.

When theomatics discovers a pattern, it must be defined by the usage of a particular Hebrew or Greek word. Every phrase to be examined must: (1) contain a specific word, (2) be a certain length away from that word in both directions, (3) use only one text and (4) examine every phrase combination or possibility present.

The computer then proceeds through all the phrases looking for features. It tallies every 'hit' within the cluster range of +1, -1 and +2, -2. The evidence is then recorded.

Next the same computer program goes back through all of the same Bible references, again looking for features. Only this time, the numerical values for the letters are jumbled into random allocations.

Standard----------------Random
    1 .............................. 6
    2 .............................. 5
    3 .............................. 3
    4 .............................. 9
    5 .............................. 8
    6 .............................. 2
    7 .............................. 1
    8 .............................. 4
    9 .............................. 7
  10 ............................ 30
  20 ............................ 70
  30 ............................ 50
  40 ............................ 80
  50 ............................ 10
  60 ............................ 20
  70 ............................ 40
  80 ............................ 90
  90 ............................ 60
100 .......................... 700
200 .......................... 200
300 .......................... 400
400 .......................... 500
500 .......................... 800
600 .......................... 100
700 .......................... 300
800 .......................... 600
 
The computer software currently in use, can mix up to one million random seed numbers. A random seed is entered and the program instantly recalculates the value of every word based upon the specific random seed number. Shown above on the right, is one example. The left side shows the standard theomatic values for the Hebrew or Greek alphabets. On the right is a sample of random values which means that for every word present in the Bible, it would now have a numerical value that is different than the original theomatic value and is most certainly random. It obviously contains no meaning or significance.

Next, the computer goes through all the references looking for random features. It tallies every 'hit' within the cluster range of +1, -1 and +2, -2. The evidence is then recorded.

Now this experiment is not done just once. It can be done hundreds of times. In fact, up to one million times.(if someone wants to take the time to do it). Over and over again the computer searches with the random allocations, trying to play catch up with theomatics.

Furthermore, not only can the programs mix up to one million alphabetical arrangements. They can also go through all the phrase combinations looking for features and attempting to find the 'best' number that produces the 'best results' within the random values common to the greatest number of references.

What this means is that if theomatics has produced a long list of features from every possible reference to a particular word or topic.(with only one set of standard allocations), the skeptic is now allowed access to hundreds, even thousands of random alphabet/number arrangements, plus he can use any number factor he wants to, in order to try and match the results of theomatics.

There are some stipulations to all this however. The skeptic must use a number at least as large as what theomatics has used or a number of the same probability, not smaller numbers. Also, the number of phrase combinations must be in the same range or length as what theomatics derived. Longer phrases, obviously have many more possible combinations in them.

The point to all this is very simple. If theomatics is untrue, if God did not put this supernatural phenomena in the Bible, then that would mean that the numbers theomatics is using, are random based. Therefore, any other random based allocations should by all reasonable logic have just as good a probability or chance of producing 'features', as what theomatics has been able to produce. Why not?


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*