On this page of
our web site, the objective is twofold: (1) To present, briefly, the method
of proof that unequivocally establishes the validity of this subject from
a scientific perspective. (2) Answer any criticism or challenges that might
pop up in the future.
So far, with the exception
of only one man from Wichita, Kansas.(Pgs.
90-97, Theomatics II), nobody
has performed any sort of procedure or scientific inquiry, intended to
either test or debunk this subject. If anyone has, they have obviously
failed, because we have never been told.
At this point, we would like
to make a bold and assertive statement that will forever stand.
It is absolutely, completely
and totally impossible to mathematically disprove theomatics. The overall
validity of this discovery---the fact that God did it---is unimpeachable.
Theomatics will never be disproved. In fact, no one will even come close.
In saying this, we do not
wish to sound cocky or arrogant. We can state the above with absolute 100%
confidence and certainty, because it is based on hard cold mathematical
facts. Numbers do not have personal feelings. They have no theological
bias or bone to pick.
If anybody out there wants
to take on theomatics, they had better prepare themselves for a major challenge.
If they do make an attempt in that direction and eventually go public with
any 'evidence', they had better also be prepared to defend it with some
hard facts. However, the only way it will be possible for that to take
place, would be for the individual so inclined, to follow a system or method
based completely on their own testing procedures or philosophical logic.
They must either ignore or distort the data that theomatics has uncovered.
They must invariably resort to an approach called deflection.
Deflection means, that if
theomatics has for its established defense, a scientific position and data
that is irrefutable, the critics will.ignore
that evidence.and
instead focus their attacks and arguments on some other 'unrelated' or
more subjective aspect of this discovery.
There are a lot of young,
cocky and cynical dudes out there in cyberspace, who would love to challenge
something like this. They actually enjoy discrediting things and trying
to debunk them. That is how they get their kicks and 'jollies'. Sort of
a predator instinct. We will be more than happy to welcome them to the
challenge. What is our advice? Be prepared to jump over the grand canyon
in your bare feet.
Establishing the Method
of Proof
There is only one way that
theomatics can either be proven or disproved. To prove it, it must
be demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt, that the numerical
structures and features come from a number base that is not random, but
is structured on intelligent design.
In order to disprove
theomatics, it must unequivocally
demonstrated, that all the data
that theomatics has thus far discovered, was found by arbitrarily picking
and choosing from a base of numbers that is strictly random.
If the numbers are not random
and there is also no basis for supernatural intelligent design, then the
skeptic
must produce a 'natural cause explanation' that both explains the results
that theomatics has achieved, plus removes any supernatural element as
the cause for the results.
There is no such explanation!.(See
complete discussion on pages 183-188, Theomatics II).
There is a lot of information
and statistical studies available on this, both in Theomatics II
and Theomatics and the Scientific Method.(theomatics.com)
Here now, we shall give a
very brief synopsis.
