An article by Jon
Matrixology 101: debates
that never happen, by Jon Rappoport
(To read about Jon's mega-collection,
Matrix Revealed, click
"In order to sustain gigantic
false realities, there are honest debates that must never happen. They
would reveal too much. They would shine a spotlight on vast contradictions.
They would expose official storytellers to withering criticism.
"And by debate, I mean extended
"The easiest way to eliminate
such debates is to never equip the young with the ability and the patience
to comprehend them.
"That's working out quite
"Let me give you an example
of a debate that will never happen.
"In 1987-88, while I was
writing my first book, AIDS Inc., I discovered that the test most
frequently used to diagnose HIV in a patient was the antibody test.
"A positive test was taken
to mean the patient was carrying HIV; he was already sick or would become
"However, I queried an employee
of the FDA. I asked if an HIV vaccine is developed, it will produce antibodies
to HIV and then the patient will be called 'immune', correct?
"In other words, if a routine
blood test reveals antibodies to HIV, the patient will be told he either
has AIDS or will get AIDS---but if those same antibodies are produced by
a vaccine, the person will be said to be immune to HIV.
"The anonymous FDA employee
answered me by mail, on a piece of paper without the FDA letterhead. This
is what he essentially said:
"If an HIV vaccine is developed,
people who take it will be given a letter they can carry around with them.
If they are ever tested for HIV and the test comes up positive, they can
show the letter to their doctor, to prove they are immune, rather than
"Otherwise, there would be
no way to distinguish between 'in danger of dying' and 'immune'.
"Extraordinary, to say the
"This opened up a huge can
of worms about several issues, one of which was the actual meaning of antibody
"Until 1985, positive antibody
tests were generally taken to mean that the patient's immune system is
in good working order; his immune system contacted the virus in question
and warded it off.
"But after 1985 and not just
in the case of AIDS, but for any virus under the sun, the same antibody
test was taken to mean that the patient is already ill or he will become
"Millions and millions of
antibody tests have been given to people around the world. Just a few of
viruses tested for are SARS, West Nile, Bird Flu, Swine Flu, Ebola,
"Think about the effects
of a doctor saying "You're positive for a very dangerous virus".
"Think about the 180-degree
turnaround in interpreting the meaning of a positive test.
"It generally went from 'You're
fine' to 'You're infected'.
"I can think of several independent
scientists who could weigh in on a debate about these tests, against official
"It would be revealing, to
say the least.
"But it would only be revealing
for people who could follow the logic and the illogic of the participants.
"Otherwise, it would be like
listening to a tape played backwards.
"The ultimate backup plan
for stifling all important debates is to never equip people with the ability
to follow and understand them.
"These days, this plan is
"Long ago, I was a schoolteacher.
I found that, if I taught students logic in a straightforward way, step
by step, with many examples, they responded. They caught on. They liked
"It made them smarter and
thus happier. It made them feel more powerful, because they were.
"Every student deserves to
earn that experience. It's a tragedy and crime that so few are given the
"The antibody test is just
one of a number of enormous issues in modern medicine that, if opened to
real debate, would cause a seismic shift in society...assuming there were
enough listeners who could track the lines of reasoning.
"A true home-schooling movement
should take notice of all this.
"Teaching logic is work.
Good work. It pays off in brighter students. It opens doors that would
otherwise remain closed. It adds real substance to the idea that home schooling
stands for individual independence and power, rather than State control."