Conclusion
The only way left, by which
theomatics can be attacked, is with pseudo.methodology.
The first and most common
course of attack, is that various individuals will seek to formulate their
own tests and experiments and perform them in their own way according to
their own style and method of logic. They will most likely start out with
a negative bias, looking to find 'any way the system does not work'. After
getting the negative result they 'hoped' to achieve, they will then publish
that information on the WWW, telling the world that they have disproved
theomatics.
The second approach will
be with speculative, hypothetical, mathematical, theorizing. This
is the sort of logic that tries to prove that aeronautically, that it is
impossible for bumble bees to fly. The person using this approach will
formulate hypothesis
and mathematical models, that theoretically seeks to get the point across,
that theomatics does not work and is not valid. This approach has already
been attempted by a man from Virginia, a brilliant mathematician. When
challenged to match the results with random numbers, he dropped out.
The third or last method,
will be to attack the logic of the whole system. This approach will be
philosophical and will seek to demonstrate that the method of logic in
interpreting numbers and associating theological meaning and concepts to
numbers, can only bring conclusions that are ridiculous and bizarre. In
other words, the argument will be made that a system of numbers cannot
carry objective meaning from God to man. While scientifically inconclusive,
this method will probably be the method used by most critics and evangelical
leaders opposed to the existence of theomatics. Of course they will have
no explanation for the statistical results that have been achieved.
The fact of the matter, is
if theomatics was untrue, matching the results with random values, would
be as easy as falling off a log. Failing to discredit or disprove the subject
on that basis, the only possible approach left, is either of the above.
More
on Theomatics
