around 38 million)
Canada in 1867 meant only
The Canadian Bill of Rights.(just
below a bit).still
exists but much of it has been consumed into The
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms).
See also Alberta
Bill of Rights, The
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Nuremberg
Code, Canadian Labour
Code and see your Canadian Passport,
inside front page, which allows for free passage without delay or hindrance
and with assistance and protection as may be necessary.
Remember you have inherent
rights from the true God that had youborn here at this time and as such
you are legally entitled to decline any of the violations of these rights.
the Nuremberg Code
and apply it to the covid con.
Crimes against Humanity and
come under Natural
Law (look up the ones not linked above),
6 and 7 of the International Criminal Court Statute, the Nuremberg Code,
The Geneva Convention, The United Nations Convention, The United Nations
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, The Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, Canadian Labor Code, Canadian Passport, Charter and Rights
VAXX DOCS - Agreement
to accept liability.pdf (for your boss)
VAXX DOCS - Informed
Consent Questions for PCR Tests.pdf
- Informed Consent information.(also
see the pdf above)
VAXX DOCS - Employment
letter, if they are threatening you to get the vax or your out of a
job. See also
employment related privacy protection
the PCR test.
Act Does NOT Apply When Exercising Masking Exemption.
Meaning, stores can't
legally ask you to leave. They have a business licence to be a public
They can't therefor claim that you are trespassing
and kick you out. But use wisdom. If it's a mask issue, for example
and you're only going to be in and out, not going to hurt you to put a
mask on for a few minutes. Just avoid those businesses next time:.Matthew
10:14 "And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when
you depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet."
12:18 If it be possible, as much as lies in you, live peaceably with
some are not of humanity, though they may look and act as though they are)."
is the website of another of Canada's highly successful constitutional
lawyers, Rocco Galati.
help, also these lawyers, Carol
Crosson, Airdrie-Calgary area and her assistance of Carmen Kissel-Verrier
and Leighton Grey, this pic and video.
Filing a complaint (details)
and law enforcement.
A business is not 'private'.
When a business obtains a business license they are open to the public
and they are not permitted to request proof
of vaccination or discriminate against anyone who decides not to wear a
mask. No exemption is required to show anyone as you have the right
Section 3, 2017 of Canada's
Non Discrimination Act, covers all covid illegalities,
as well as other vaccinations,
no testing, masks, distancing, etc.
It's serious as violation is a criminal offense
carrying up to a $75,000 fine and/or a stint
in prison of up to five years. The Canadian
Labor Code lays it out.
To file a complaint go to
a justice of the peace or your lawyer to start the process. If you don't
stand against tyranny, tyranny
will stand on you.
"I am against every form
of tyranny over the mind of man."....Thomas
Once a complaint
is filed, they'll be charged for treating you as they did, as your human
rights were violated.
Canadian Human Rights
Denial of commercial premises
or residential accommodation
6 It is a discriminatory
practice in the provision of commercial premises or residential accommodation
(a) to deny occupancy of
such premises or accommodation to any individual or
(b) to differentiate adversely
in relation to any individual, on a prohibited ground of discrimination.
Federal Privacy Act:
Nobody has the right to request to see an exemption. It is a violation
of your privacy rights under the Privacy Act.
This is your personal medical information between you and your physician.
Pursuant to s. 1 of the Privacy
Act of B.C., RSBC 1996 CHAPTER 373, it is unlawful to violate the privacy
of another person. Private health issues are strictly between an individual
and their physician. There is no legal or
any other obligation at law requiring anyone to divulge the nature of thier
medical conditions with anyone.
Federal privacy laws and
what they cover
Canada has two federal privacy
laws that are enforced by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada:
Privacy Act, which covers how the federal
government handles personal information;
Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act
(PIPEDA), which covers how businesses handle personal information.
The Privacy Act
From a New Brunswick business
owner: To any business owner that is thinking of supporting the v pass......
Here are the facts:
-If you choose to discriminate
against someone based off of medical conditions, race, sex, religion etc
or in this case, one does NOT have an V-Pass (it's illegal, so why would
you be asking for it?) you are liable
for thousands of dollars in fines and courts costs and a prison term.
-The NB government cannot
intervene in a dispute between a person(s) and business or businesses.
You have to initiate action before the court can act.
-A business saying they
are 'following the government mandate'
(which are technically illegal at this point or untested in court) is not
a defense or reason to deny.
-Upon a complaint filed
to the Human Rights Commission
against your business, you the business owner will be asked to explain
why you discriminated.
-The government will NOT
help small businesses defend the matter (makes you think why the big franchise
restaurant got a pass).
-You the business owner
will eventually be fined and pay legal costs including damages under the
current Federal Law. Again there there is NO legal protection offered by
the government for you. (I encourage you to do your research and seek legal
Feel free to contact your
BIA, Lawyer or Human Rights commissioner (1-888-471-2233) for your own
diligence where you can file complaints about businesses violating
human rights like Community Natural Foods in Calgary, Alberta. See
Filing rights violation
Also see Nuremberg Code.
At Action4Canada.com, lawyer
Rocco Galati's mission is to protect Canada's rich heritage which is founded
on Judeo-Christian principles.
Inherited through our British
Commonwealth and embedded in the Magna
Carta, it forms our laws and values and is a system of governance which
sets us apart from totalitarian, communist and socialist regimes. Giving
Canadians the freedom to believe or not to believe, without fear of persecution.
The Canadian Bill of
1960, c. 44
An Act for the Recognition
and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
[Assented to 10th August
The Parliament of Canada,
affirming that the Canadian Nation is founded
upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God.(Natural
Law), the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of
the family in a society of free men and free institutions;
Affirming also that men and
institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for
moral and spiritual values and the rule of law;
And being desirous of enshrining
these principles and the human rights and fundamental freedoms derived
from them, in a Bill of Rights which shall reflect the respect of Parliament
for its constitutional authority and which shall ensure the protection
of these rights and freedoms in Canada:
Therefore Her Majesty, by
and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada,
enacts as follows:
BILL OF RIGHTS
Recognition and declaration
of rights and freedoms
1. It is hereby recognized
and declared that in Canada there have existed and shall continue to exist
without discrimination by reason of race, national origin, colour, religion
or sex, the following human rights and fundamental freedoms, namely,
right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment
of property and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process
right of the individual to equality before the law and the protection of
of assembly and association; and
of the press.
Construction of law
2. Every law of Canada shall,
unless it is expressly declared by an Act of the Parliament of Canada that
it shall operate notwithstanding the Canadian Bill of Rights, be so construed
and applied as not to abrogate, abridge or
infringe or to authorize the abrogation, abridgment or infringement of
any of the rights or freedoms herein recognized and declared and in particular,
no law of Canada shall be construed or applied so as to
(a) authorize or effect the
detention, imprisonment or exile of any person;
or authorize the imposition of cruel and unusual treatment or punishment;
(c) deprive a person who
has been arrested or detained
(i) of the right to be informed
promptly of the reason for his arrest or detention,
(ii) of the right to retain
and instruct counsel without delay or
(iii) of the remedy by way
of habeas corpus for the determination of the validity of his detention
and for his release if the detention is not lawful;
(d) authorize a court, tribunal,
commission, board or other authority to compel a person to give evidence
if he is denied counsel, protection against self crimination or other constitutional
(e) deprive a person of the
right to a fair hearing in accordance with the principles of fundamental
justice for the determination of his rights and obligations;
(f) deprive a person charged
with a criminal offence of the right to be presumed innocent until proved
guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent
and impartial tribunal, or of the right to reasonable bail without just
(g) deprive a person of the
right to the assistance of an interpreter in any proceedings in which he
is involved or in which he is a party or a witness, before a court, commission,
board or other tribunal, if he does not understand or speak the language
in which such proceedings are conducted.
Duties of Minister of Justice
3. (1) Subject to
subsection (2), the Minister of Justice shall, in accordance with such
regulations as may be prescribed by the Governor in Council, examine every
regulation transmitted to the Clerk of the Privy Council for registration
pursuant to the Statutory Instruments Act and every Bill introduced in
or presented to the House of Commons by a Minister of the Crown, in order
to ascertain whether any of the provisions thereof are inconsistent with
the purposes and provisions of this Part and he shall report any such inconsistency
to the House of Commons at the first convenient opportunity.
(2) A regulation need
not be examined in accordance with subsection (1) if prior to being made
it was examined as a proposed regulation in accordance with section 3 of
the Statutory Instruments Act to ensure that it was not inconsistent with
the purposes and provisions of this Part.
1960, c. 44, s. 3; 1970-71-72,
c. 38, s. 29; 1985, c. 26, s. 105; 1992, c. 1, s. 144(F).
4. The provisions
of this Part shall be known as the Canadian Bill of Rights.
5. (1) Nothing in
Part I shall be construed to abrogate or abridge any human right or fundamental
freedom not enumerated therein that may have existed in Canada at the commencement
of this Act. (such
as the Magna Carta)
"Law of Canada" defined
(2) The expression
"law of Canada" in Part I means an Act of the Parliament of Canada enacted
before or after the coming into force of this Act, any order, rule or regulation
thereunder and any law in force in Canada or in any part of Canada at the
commencement of this Act that is subject to be repealed, abolished or altered
by the Parliament of Canada.
Jurisdiction of Parliament
(3) The provisions
of Part I shall be construed as extending only to matters coming within
the legislative authority of the Parliament of Canada.
Constitutional Act of 1791
popular title for the Canada
Act, a statute passed by the British Parliament in which the old province
of Québec was divided into two provinces:.Lower
and Upper Canada. The term "constitutional" was applied because the
enactment established parliamentary or representative, government.
Following the passage of
the act, elaborate political machinery was set up in each province. Executive
and legislative councils were appointed and legislative assemblies were
elected. Provision was made for creating land endowments, called clergy
reserves, for the support of a Protestant clergy. This type of representative
government was considered the ultimate in contemporary British colonial
practice and was optimistically described as being a direct transcript
In practice, however, the
Constitutional Act of 1791 was a disappointment. The fundamental difficulty
was the division, both economic and social, which developed within the
provinces. In constitutional terms, the Canadian executive councils did
not resemble the British cabinet; they remained distinct bodies without
connection to the legislative assemblies. Efforts to establish connection
by making the speaker of the Assembly of Lower Canada a member of the Executive
Council failed and friction among the branches of the legislature became
a feature of Canadian political life.
In January 1838, as a result
of the Rebellions of 1837 (series of insurrections against colonial rule
by Britain), parliamentary government was suspended in Lower Canada in
favor of administration by special council. Three years later, Upper and
Lower Canada were joined in a legislative union under the Act
of Union of 1840. However, the problem of the lack of responsibility
of the executive council to the legislative assembly, which had prevailed
under the Constitutional Act of 1791, remained and was not removed until
Encarta® Encyclopedia 99. © 1993-1998 Microsoft Corporation. All
Canada Act 1982.is
an Act of Parliament passed by the British Parliament, such as was
the Statute of Westminister that severed all remaining constitutional and
legislative ties between the United Kingdom and Canada.
British Parliament at this time had long since forgotten anything about
what the Statute of Westminster was about. The Canada Act was the last
request of the Ottawa government to amend what came to be called a constitution
for Canada. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the Patriation Reference
(a Resolution to amend the Constitution,  1 S.C.R. 753, also known
as the Patriation Reference, a historic Supreme Court of Canada reference
case that occurred during negotiations for the patriation of the Constitution
of Canada) that a substantial level of consent from the provinces was needed
according to constitutional conventions.
n d e x o f t h i s p a r t o f s i t e