.
.
S i t e  S e a r c h

A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ

List of Topics__Ask Suby__Free Stuff__Questions Lists
Terms of Use__________________Privacy Policy

C r e a t i o n  I n d e x
C o m m e n t s  O n  E v o l u t i o n  p a g e  1 8
(alphabetical list of comments)

...continues from...

"They are not, as a rule, led up to by a sequence of almost imperceptibly changing forerunners such as Darwin believed should be usual in evolution. A great many sequences of two or a few temporally.intergrading.species are known, but even at this level most species appear without known 'immediate' ancestors, and really long, perfectly complete sequences of numerous species are exceedingly rare. Sequences of genera, immediately successive or nearly so at that level.(not necessarily represented by the exact populations involved in the transition from one genus to the next), are more common and may be longer than known sequences of species. But the appearance of a new genus in the record is usually more abrupt than the appearance of a new species: the gaps involved are generally larger, that is, when a new genus appears in the record it is usually well separated morphologically from the most nearly similar other known genera. This phenomenon becomes more universal and more intense as the hierarchy of categories is ascended. Gaps among known species are sporadic and often small. Gaps among known orders, clans, and phyla are systematic and almost always large."

o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o


Prof. J. B. Waterhouse, Department of Geology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Inaugural Lecture, 1980.."But how good is the geological record? I have already mentioned that the ordinary viewpoint of evolution held by most paleontologists favours gradual incremental change. The fossil record, they say, is too incomplete to take seriously. And, they say, you cannot prove a gap. But of course you can prove a gap, especially if clines occurred. If there is a break in the record it must be possible to detect the break. The main point about breaks is that, if they were really random, as proposed by Darwin, they must have been plugged by one hundred and fifty years of work. But the gaps have not been plugged. They still persist; yet authorities still plead the cause of failure of preservation. Such authorities forget that if there is a million to one chance of one specimen of a population being preserved and then if that species lived 5-15 million years, we therefore will get 5-15 times the population fossilized. The trouble may perhaps have lain more truthfully in our failure to find or describe the material. It is special pleading.(to offer reasons for or against something).to rely on gaps and it is special pleading to propose inadequate preservation. We would do better to look at what the record really says."

o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o


Ronald R. West, Ph.D., paleoecology and geology, Assistant Professor of Paleobiology at Kansas State University, 'Paleoecology and uniformitarianism',.Compass, vol. 45, May, 1968."Contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution because it is this theory.(there are several).which we use to interpret the fossil record. By doing so we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports this theory." 

o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o


'Weird Wonders: Was the Cambrian Explosion a Big Bang Or a Whimper?'.T. Beardsley,.Scientific American, June, 1992, pages 30,31."The rate of appearance of new life forms demand a mechanism other than natural selection for its explanation."

o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o


Physicist Freeman Dyson."I do not feel like an alien in this Universe. The more I examine the Universe and study the details of its architecture, the more evidence I find that the Universe in some sense must have known we were coming.".(*)

o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o


Prof. E. J. H. Corner, Professor of Tropical Botany, Cambridge University, UK, 'Evolution' in 'Contemporary Botanical Thought', Anna M. Macleod and L. S. Cobley, editors, Oliver and Boyd, for the Botanical Society of Edinburgh, 1961, p.97."I still think that, to the unprejudiced, the fossil record of plants is in favour of special creation. If, however, another explanation could be found for this hierarchy of classification, it would be the knell of the theory of evolution. Can you imagine how an orchid, a duckweed  and a palm have come from the same ancestry and have we any evidence for this assumption? The evolutionist must be prepared with an answer, but I think that most would break down before an inquisition.(investigative questioning)."

o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o


J. R. Norman, Assistant Keeper, Department of Zoology, British Museum of Natural History, London, 'Classification and pedigrees: fossils' in 'A History of Fishes', Dr. P. H. Greenwood, editor, third edition, British Museum of Natural History, London, 1975, p. 343."The geological record has so far provided no evidence as to the origin of the fishes and shortly after the time when fish like fossils first made their appearance in the rocks; the Cyclostomes.(or Agnatha), Elasmobranchiomorphs and Bony Fishes are not only already differentiated from each other and firmly established, but are represented by a number of diverse and often specialized types, a fact suggesting that each group had already enjoyed a respectable antiquity.(ancient times)."
 

.
.
"My silence could mean you are not worth the argument."....Unknown.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*