But once out in the real
world, away from the fanciful
theory of evolution, intelligent kids look at say, a
tree, wondering over the precision and intricacy
and just how all this came about. They consider their bodies and the incredible
intricacy of them and how they are such meticulously designed systems.
40:5 "Many, O LORD my God, are your wonderful works which you have
done and your thoughts which are to us-ward.
They cannot be reckoned up in order unto you. If I would declare and speak
of them, they are more than can be numbered." Psalms
92:5 "O LORD, how great are your works! and your thoughts are very
Fairy tales of life and
death are ideas designed for adult simpletons,
often by those wishing to control them. Believing that all events in nature
are without spirit is believing all substances have no space in them.
Like duh! what
has their education been? 1,
Learners such as these are completely out of touch with what is known by
scientists about life. And this mostly because they allowed the information
to be adopted by themselves, perhaps by coercion,
such as 'shut up, don't ask questions,
just suck in the information if you want to pass your grade and get a job'.
Those doing the teaching
often have to avoid truth as it all too often violates the established
teaching institution's curriculum,
which itself is controlled by those who designed the curriculum. As Einstein
one can never solve the problems in life from the same level of thinking
having created them.
For others who are at least
in a state of cognitive
dissonance, those who are of open-minded
and of questioning minds, we have this information conclusively disproving
the theory of creation by evolution.as
is commonly taught. No one has proved evolution is true regarding origins
of mankind, regarding the beginning of life's organisms.
It is still a theory with many gigantic
Evolutionists use deductive
reasoning, but it's modified
according to who may be doing the deducing. In nature, things are created
unified as a whole in such a way that nature's properties cannot be derived
from an analysis of its parts, which is the modern but changing scientific
theory that by looking at individual parts we can comprehend what the item
in question may be. Problem is many things share similar if not exact components,
yet work in different ways. Such is the DNA
of an ape when compared to a human's DNA.
Evolution as as an explanation
to answering mankind's presence on Earth is a theory irreparably damaged
and therefore relegated
to the scrapheap of dead fables,
for why would one prefer to teach fables instead of reality? A good movie
about it: Ben Stein's.(remember
Ben Stein's Money?).movie
No Intelligence Allowed; type it in Google's or Bing's video search
"The problems of the world
cannot possibly be solved by skeptics
or cynics whose
horizons are limited by the obvious realities.(or
tho put it another way as Einstein
did). We need men who can dream
of things that never were."....John
I think evolutionists only
understood the last line of President Kennedy's comment. Ha ha!
"The state must not claim
the right to take human life away, which belongs only to the Almighty."....Vladimir
Putin. Life is 'taken away' by many subtle
A good article and/or DVD
set below will show once and for all that the evolutionary theory as is
propagated is irreparably
damaged and therefore is relegated to the scrapheap of dead fables, joining
such stupid idiotic 'classics' as.Little
Red Riding Hood, The Rocking Horse Winner, Hansel and Gretel
of Evolution .
In this the entire purpose
word means 'to bring forth from within the innate
essential characteristics of the
spirit that makes us what it is we are as individual human beings').
Evolution is the only field
where an answer is decided upon, then evidence is searched for in order
to support the answer selected. This completely stupid approach of 'evolution
in reverse' is unscientific and a waste of time, to say the least,
but it blindly carries on in the search evolution has for its hopeful
Evolution should be discussed
in school so students can see how far off man can get in his reasonings
when at a low level of consciousness.
Evolutionists can only come up with evidences for evolution to someone
who already believes in evolution and is of a mind to accept what may fit
into his own future plans. It's really
a religon and a blind one at that!
Such 'kids fables' are for
those whose thinking processes are in a primary
stage of development. It is in the same category
and the Three Bears, The Rocking Horse Winner.and
Little Engine That Could.
Like hello, why is it some
evolutionists seem unable to progress beyond this primary
stage. What has school done
to them? 'Them seem unable to think!'
1) No parents, no
evolution. A species would have to jump from a primitive form to a fully
developed male and female, each with the ability and instinct to mate;
2) Did the first
animal develop 10% of complete veins, then 20% and on up to 100%, with
veins throughout its entire body and brain? Then how did the heart slowly
develop in the animal and get attached to the veins in the right spot?
How did the blood enter the system? The blood could not enter before the
veins were complete or it would spill out. Where did the blood come from?
Did the blood have red corpuscles, white corpuscles, platelets and plasma?
At what point in this process of development did the heart start beating?
How did it start beating? What caused it to start beating? What is it that
keeps it going? Why does it beat in the way it does?
3) Did the animal
develop a partial stomach, then a complete stomach? After the stomach was
formed, how did the digestive juices enter the stomach? Where did the hydrochloric
acid as part of the digestive juices come from? What about its kidney and
bladder? The animal better not eat anything prior to this. How did the
animal survive during these changes? and over thousands of years? Of course,
at the same time the animal's eyes must be fully developed so it can see
its food and his brain must be fully developed so the animal can control
its body to get to the food. Like the heart, brain, veins and stomach,
all of the organs and systems in the first animal's body must be fully
functional in the first moments of life. This indicates that evolution
couldn't occur, and the fossil record indicates that.it
In other words, if you cannot
come up with a detailed, feasible scenario of how the first animal developed,
the whole evolutionary theory goes out the window, because it never could
have even gotten started!
A theory is only true until
the process attempting to prove it fails. In the case of evolution where
every single one of the processes have failed, we must consider that 'doing
the same thing over and over and expecting a different result' is a sign
of insanity or an attempt to bamboozle.
Why are we allowing children to be taught an insane theory? Are we trying
to develop insanity
in them? Are those who still accept it as being true also insane? Why do
we 'keep hugging a long since dead horse? Are there no proven truths to
Or are there other reasons
for hiding the dead horse away and telling others that it's still alive
and showing a 'piece of hair from its mane' as authenticity? Jobs maybe?
Habit? Something to laugh about after people accept it as being true, like
pulling a joke on someone? or, maybe just craziness resulting from entrenched
mass mind programming.
In evolutionary theory, those
chance mutations that suit an organism better to its environment are preserved
by the process called natural
selection. But the 'invisible god' called natural selection cannot
act until the favored traits arise by mutation, i.e.,
by time and chance.
Evolutionists beginning in
the 19th century argued that design could be explained on the basis of
time, chance and properties of matter that did not require a Designer.
Can you believe they actually were that stupid back then? Evolution is
good science. It's not science at all and is an embarrassment
to true science. Fact is, there's absolutely
real science at all to it. It's simply a fable
Scientific American Magazine.[SA
plays a part in evolution.(for
example, in the random mutations
that can give rise to new traits),
but evolution does not depend on chance to create organisms, proteins,
or other entities. Quite the opposite: natural selection, the principal
known mechanism of evolution, harnesses nonrandom change by preserving
and eliminating 'undesirable'
What this part of the
article is saying is 'We dedicated fanatically religious
evolutionists do indeed believe with all faith, assurance, hope, zeal,
and pride that evolution is on such solid ground it doesn't have to depend
upon 'any little old thing like chance'.
consider evolution the 'be
all end all' wonderful answer endowing.peons.with
belief necessary for comprehension of origins, existence and life all encompassing,
that is, it envelopes, it blankets, it covers, it enwraps, it surrounds,
it achieves, it constitutes, it includes and it encircles everything about
life. Wow! We evolutionists are so excited! We just love it!
But to believe so radically,
we evolutionists really have to bypass the fact that our beloved natural
provides an inept
explanation regarding the origins of complex self-reproducing life forms
and we, the most highly trained, the most throughly educated, the most
remarkably and specially focused educated elite
the world has ever seen, really have no way to explain this essential step
in our evolutionary belief of life, but hey, what the hell, we're so indoctrinated
in evolution we believe it anyway! It's our religion! Gung
ho brother! Praise Darwin!
the Creator having a purpose for humans. Evolution places human destiny
in man's hand.
Evolution is based on an
ancient ugly primordial soup mankind is supposed to have come from, perhaps
something like the movies of the 'living dead' staggering out from a swamp.
Contrast Creator-God, who created mankind after making such a beautiful
garden for them to inhabit.
Under the following
headings Darwinian evolution is examined, molecularly, anatomically
Some of the following remarkable
information comes from.Darwin's
Black Box, a book by Michael Behe, Professor of Biochemistry. 'Black
Box' because many of the component parts are unknown, as Darwin
Perhaps you too may shake
your head in wonder after reading all this.(about
15-18 hours if you follow all the links in this subject, dictionary explanations,
in an age providing quantitative
information, why there is such incomprehensible
ignorance? In fact after reading it all, you will be.awed
by how brilliant the mind of the Great Engineer is,.the
Rather than proofs of evolution,
all that evolutionists can come up with are evidences for evolution that
ring true to some other unthinking soul who already has accepted evolution
as true? This is akin
to circular reasoning.
Hey! 4 nights TV for most
of you! And I guarantee you'll have infinitely more knowledge than you'll
get watching the stupor.box,
unless, of course, you watch the channels and/or programs where you can
really learn something interesting that broadens your perspective of life
and that which supports and/or affects it in some helpful way, like Discovery
Channel, The Learning Channel, PBS, Access Channel.(in
On the cable channel from
time to time The Secret World of Gardens is replayed. One could
try NetFlix or YouTube, etc.. It's all about the habits of insects, snakes,
etc. inhabiting your garden. What is brought out was astounding! The photography
in this program is incredible and the presentation is entirely first class.
One of the most interesting and enjoyable presentations on television;
a critically acclaimed television series, nominated in 6 categories at
the Gemini Awards, including Best Documentary Series, Best Nature/Environment/Science
Program and Best Direction in a Documentary Series.
In this subject on Creation
you'll find out why evolutionists rely upon qualitative.assumptions,
when quantitative scientific information is readily