Once complex systems
are understood, one can see that any evolutionist saying that man came
from a monkey or an ape is tantamount
to saying that from a tricycle or bicycle, the motorcycle evolved. "Was
it from your grandfather line or grandmother line through whom your descent
from a monkey occurred?" is a question that has been asked of evolutionists.
But some evolutionists have their
own.crackpot.theory.
Evolution is a developmental
process when it comes to many inanimate
things. Improvement occurs when R & D.(research
and development).leads
to further development, but the Creator does
things differently.
Development of the telephone
had some 3000 failures, the many 'transitional species' of which are in
museums. Airplanes had propellers. Modern aircraft use jet engines. Ideas
do evolve. Windows 3.1 to 95 to 98 to 2000, ME to XP to Vista to Windows
7 to 8, to 8:1, to Windows 10. Some improvements work better than others.
A writer subjects his manuscript to many revisions before publication occurs.
High quality ideas come from much thinking over large spans of time involving
great effort, unless
one is clairvoyant.
If the evolution of life.(animate
forms).happened
on planet Earth, we should see enormity of evidence of transitional improvements.
But there is none, apart from the
frauds.
More
on design...
One could say that the bicycle
was a conceptual.precursor
to the space probe, but it certainly would not be a physical precursor.
Darwinian evolution requires
physical precursors, yet relies on conceptual precursors. A jet plane can't
be turned into a particle
collider one nut and one bolt at a time even though both the plane
and the collider contain nuts and bolts, washers and pins.
One cannot modify any parts
of a tricycle or bicycle and end up with a motorcycle,
because a vast gap exists, that of missing complex systems. A bicycle does
not have a fossil fuel based propulsion
system comprising a motor with pistons, or an electrical system for ignition.
One cannot take parts of one irreducibly complex system and use them directly
as specialized parts of another irreducibly complex system. For example,
it would be silly to take out the motor of a jet plane and its suspension
system and attempt to place them directly in an automobile, or vice versa,
unless the parts are extensively modified by intention,
design and effort.
One could modify a bicycle
to.look like.a
motorcycle, but it would still be a bicycle nonetheless. One could say
that transportation evolved from a bicycle to a motorcycle, then automobile,
airplane, jet plane, rocket, space shuttle and then space probe. This would
be true. It is also true that the unformed substance, the
quantum 'soup',.evolves
into the formed, the invisible
to the physical.
AMP:.Even
in a 'simple' cell,
complex precursors
are required in able for it to function. AMP,
however, is.very.complicated.
Many successive steps are involved in the complicated process to make AMP
and the intermediates.(say,
A, B and C, with D being AMP for the sake of the example).are
not used.
If A, B and C have no use
other than as precursors to D.(AMP,
a cell's fuel), what advantage is there
to an organism to make just A, B and C? Why the precursors? Why not just
make D without the intermediary steps? Yet this is what happens in the
production of AMP, an automated complex system involving highly complicated
molecules explained on pages 142-149, 157-160 in.Darwin's
Black Box. AMP is an important component necessary for DNA manufacture,
built from the energy even a 'simple' cell.(organelles).produces.
If evolution be true, where
is the evidence forcing
natural
selection to take such a circuitous.route?
Explanations for this are seldom attempted in evolutionary literature,
but, we have
one!
If creation by God be true,
why do some scientists disagree? Some do. Some don't. Here
they are.
Some disagree for perhaps
this reason:.Romans
1:21 "Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God,
neither were thankful, but became vain in their imaginations and their
foolish heart was darkened.".Many
scientists have come to see proofs of God's
existence, but then they just carry on as they always have, not letting
those things affect them and for various
reasons. God never overrides
anybody's mindset, so just leaves them alone.
Evolution would have these
precursors
taken out of the way, being unfit themselves for anything but to ensure
the function of D..(is
this altruism on a micro scale?).Darwinian
evolution relegates
them to the death house as it were.
D could not exist without
these precursors. But it does exist! The fact that D exists and how it
got to exist, instead, relegates Darwinian evolution to the
death house.
Removing an essential component
from a complex system renders
the system useless, as useless as the Darwinian 'survival
of the fittest' element of his theory.
In addition to the complexity
in these simple processes, A, to be what it is in chemical formulation,
requires various enzymes.
The binding of AMP causes a scissor like opening in an enzyme, inactivating
the enzyme. ATP also involves shut off
processes.
You can see the complexity
in these few simple processes necessary to produce fuel for a 'simple'
cell. How did this pathway develop? What explanation have evolutionary
scientists produced to account for these
metabolic
pathways? None, apart from conceptual.postulations?
DNA being the building blocks
of life and requiring AMP, either had to have a way to immediately produce
it or obtain it, or it dies. A lottery win requiring six numbers presents
horrendous odds for a win to not any particular person. How much greater
are the odds involved to win for a specific person? These are the odds
faced due to
myriad.factors,
some of which we discussed here, involved in the cell's 'winning', the
subsistence.of
life itself.
