Brain:.Is
our brain wired for language at birth? Just how
does the brain, this amazing electronic switching station, do what
it does, such as enable you to change the vibration
of yourself and everything around you?
How
did the brain come to be as it is? What
really is the brain and mind for?
Steven Pinker.(MIT
{Massachusetts Institute of Technology)."The
lesson from verbs is that our minds combine the best of both worlds. The
brains we are born with come with a in built program for manipulating regular
verbs.(matched
from match, say).whereas
the past tenses of irregular verbs.(catch
to caught).have
to be individually memorized...a dazzling range of facts suggesting the
brain handles regular and irregular verbs quite differently."
...Words and Rules.by
Steven Pinker, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 214-99, ISBN
0297816470.
The brain is designed to
function continually as it's a
decoding instrument allowing us to experience what
appears to us to be solid things.
The left brain hemisphere
operates serially.(sequential
transmission of signals
over one main nerve {one signal after another; like ten cars traveling
all in one lane behind each other or magazines
subscribed to which come each month})
and the right, as a parallel
processor (simultaneous
transmission of all signals over separate nerves, like 10 cars traveling
beside each other all going in the same direction).and
why do the two cerebral cortices
use the corpus
callosum in communication with each other? A very sophisticated
system, brilliantly designed!
The
body and the brain are physically altered by both one's activities
and thoughts. All you are and do affects
what you are and become.
Evolution as Faith:.By
failing to account
quantitatively
for the complexity of the primate,
evolution invalidates
any potential calculations for verification.thus
becoming
fideistic.
By deciding to leave Creator-God
out of the picture, looking instead for answers down blind alleys evolutionary
theory continually presents, such as natural selection, gradualism, Darwinian
descent, modification through mutation, survival of the fittest, etc.,
evolutionary 'scientists' remain bound with parochial.conjectural.concepts,
leading them to avoid mathematically.corroborative.precepts.
Providing no scientific equation.to.justify
that evidence encountered resulted from evolutionary processes, evolution
distances itself from the scientific realm
and instead presents itself to us for acceptance both with the ethereality
of conjecture
and the expectation, followers will be as compliant
to its tenets
as those hoodwinked
into the Jonestown tragedy...
Many evolutionists then,
by calling themselves 'of science', thusly
and hypocritically
so, as evolution conveys anti-knowledge,
enter into an unfounded
faith, whereas,
Christians have a provably unshakable basis
for faith.
It's just another dark
side trick, a fraud.
Wherever you see frauds, you can know what is behind them:.John
8:44 "...when he speaks a lie, he speaks of his
own, for he is a liar
and the father of it."
"With the failure of these
many efforts science was left in the somewhat embarrassing position of
having to postulate
theories of living origins.(and
outright
lies).which
it could not demonstrate. After having
chided
the theologian
for his reliance on myth and miracle, science found itself in the unenviable
position of having to create a mythology of its own; namely, the assumption
that what, after long effort, could not be proved to take place today had,
in truth, taken place in the primeval past."....Loren
Eiseley, Ph.D..(anthropology),
'The secret of life' in.The
Immense Journey, Random House, New York, 1957, p. 199. If evolution
is forever going on somewhere; where?
"I don't see how anyone
can protest that his beliefs ought to be immune to the standards of objective
historical investigation, simply by claiming that they are held on the
basis of faith.".Paul
Kurtz,.The
New Skepticism:
Inquiry and Reliable Knowledge, 1992,
Prometheus Books, Amherst, New York.
And when a mathematically
scientific approach is applied in examination of evolutionary tenets, those
tenets fall apart as when a gust of wind comes across a house of cards.
Darwin took
it for granted that evolution had a purpose and a direction as evidenced
by his concept
of randomness.
Darwin explains the adaptiveness
of life by attributing
it to natural
selection. He tried to supply the tools of evolution. His starting
point was the study of interaction between species.
He had the idea of a 'tree' connecting different life forms each undergoing
transmutation.
The reality however is different,
involving
anomalistic.transmogrifications.
Darwin
presupposed
that life arrived
spontaneously
in some warm pond, as a result
of occurrences called random.mutations,
that being magically a result of his survival
of the fittest belief providing the impetus
to the action of natural selection producing adaption
and eliminating the
weaker in the species thus.eliciting
over time descent
by modification. He could have just as easily stated that life came from
seeds planted by aliens. It would make more sense than his convoluted
theory.
Are results we see in life's
organisms really the product of evolutionary features? Evolutionists like
Steve
Jones are still trying to verify
the theory by reconstruction of features supporting evolution, in
spite of historical facts disembodying the common understanding of
evolution's structural mechanisms.
