.
S
i t e S e a r c h
A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ
List
of Topics__Ask
Suby__Free
Stuff__Questions
Lists
Terms
of Use__________________Privacy
Policy
C
r e a t i o n I n d e x
C r e a t i o n
p a g e 2 1
And it does win! It was designed
to by a brilliant intelligence, one whose creation never
fails.
In providing the cell with
its 'food' through these intermediary steps, each step calls on various
enzymes in order to produce the end result, that of life itself. And these
are relatively simple systems compared to what you'll read if you carry
on to the blood,
immune
system, etc.
Metabolic pathways
where intermediates are not useful, present severe challenges to a Darwinian
scheme of evolution.
Contrasting the 'religious'
fervor
and deceitfulness of some modern
day evolutionary devotees,
who have hijacked
Darwin's theory to hinge their conjectural.idiocies,
whose thinking processes also unfortunately have spilled
over to others with sinister
motives, Darwin, considering the science available in his day, at least
exhibited
commonsense
and honesty.
Darwin:."If
it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not
possibly have been formed by numerous successive, slight modifications,
my theory would absolutely break down.".And
that
has occurred.
"Natural
Selection.entails.divergence
of character and the extinction
of less improved forms."....Charles
Darwin.
Darwin,
in a private letter to J.D. Dana."I
know that you are not a believer in the doctrine
of single points
of creation.(also,
here).in
which doctrine I am strongly inclined to believe...It is my intention to
give fully all the facts in favor of the eternal immutability
of species and I have taken as much pain to collect them as I possibly
could do. But what my work will turn out, I know not; but I do know I have
worked hard and honestly at my subject."....page
160,.Charles
Darwin Letters, 1825-1859, edited by Frederick Burkhardt, 1996, Cambridge
University Press, London.
Unlike many religiously fanatical
evolutionists today who use evolution as a wand to wave over mysteries
they avoid delving
into, while simultaneously claiming
the opposite, Darwin remained as open minded toward new concepts
as many of the professional
scientists you will soon read about here. For that Darwin is to be
commended. He was always most respectful of his
wife and their Christian friends.
Too bad those who hijacked
Darwin's writings to purport
their own agenda,
lacked the sincerity
Darwin evidenced.
I agree with Darwin: If a
theory claims to be able to explain some phenomena,
but does not generate even an attempt at an explanation, it should be banished!
Unless it can be shown in the professional scientific literature, detailed
models by which biochemical systems.(blood,
immune system, nervous
systems, cells, etc.).could
have been produced by other than immediate creation, the teaching of evolution
is totally unfounded.
Perhaps it could have value in being read as a story to chimpanzees along
with its psychological equivalent,.The
Rocking Horse Winner.
"His theory had, in essence,
preceded his knowledge, that is, he had hit upon a novel and evocative
theory of evolution with limited knowledge at hand to satisfy either himself
or others that the theory was true. He could neither accept it himself
nor prove it to others. He simply did not know enough concerning the several
natural history fields upon which his theory would have to be based."....Dr.
Barry Gale, Science Historian, Darwin College, UK, in his book,.Evolution
Without Evidence. As quoted in John Lofton's Journal,.The
Washington Times, February 8, 1984.
It's so strange! The success
of Darwinism as orthodoxy
to some evolutionists gives credence
to how all of us acquire the concepts
we have accepted as being
valid.
Can we apply Darwin's theory
conceptually? Of course. Will his theory fit the
bicycle
analogy? Yes. Can we apply it to complex biological processes? Absolutely
not at all! What good is his theory then to explain life's origin? It shows
how he thought and it's an interesting imaginative story. And that's about
all!
Perhaps there is some yet
unknown process that may prove evolution true, is like saying that somehow
natural processes can explain computers.
The part of Darwin's theory
that hold's the most promise was his belief in knocking off the work day
at noon!
The body relies upon many
complex systems in its functioning. If these were to arise somehow by evolution,
the theory must also consider a system's level of performance, which it
doesn't. The theory of evolution proves highly inadequate in the light
of detailed examination of irreducibly
complex fully functioning organisms.(any
living thing; anything resembling a living thing in its complexity of structure
or functions). For example; performance
of a system must be adequate
if it is to survive and flourish.
If you were hungry, thirsty
and alone in the middle of a desert, and you came across a vehicle and
it started and the tires were good and all seemed to work, your hopes would
be short lived if the level of performance of the vehicle was such that
only under full power could a distance equal to about the vehicle length
be achieved daily. The system Creator-God designed works optimally.
Organized complexity doesn't
need any explanation; it is what it is observed to be, complex biological
design.
Evolution attempts at constructive
realism, but its position in the domain of quasi.behavioral
science, has been relegated.to
that of pseudo
scientific jargon,
by the conclusive fact of intelligent design.(as
one can soon see here).and
can be likened to ancient cartographers early maps, whose validity.depends
upon where you stand and what use you want from the map.
Modern 'educated', or shall
we say, indoctrinated,
or perhaps better, propagandized
evolutionists, if they are to use Darwin's theory, should at least show
forth some intelligence and consider emulating
his character qualities of sincerity and honesty, prior
to espousing
his theory.
