.
S
i t e S e a r c h
A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ
List
of Topics__Ask
Suby__Free
Stuff__Questions
Lists
Terms
of Use__________________Privacy
Policy
C
r e a t i o n I n d e x
C r e a t i o n
p
a g e 1 8
Was man being here a result
of gradual evolution over millions of years, by means of natural selection
acting upon minute organisms to, given enough time, develop the complex
physiological
structures of animals we see today? In fact, is this at all possible? One
thing about life.(unlike
the creation evolution describes),
it is an ongoing molecular phenomenon.
Here we are! Plants and animals are here.
The complex systems are
here. All things got here somehow! Fact: The origin of life is an
historical event. If not in Darwinian fashion, then how? Clearly, if something
was not put together gradually, then it must
have been put together quickly, or
even suddenly, because there is evidence of togetherness.
"The challenge to evolution
is answering the questions posed by blood clotting, cellular transport
and disease fighting."....Michael
Behe.
Evolutionary scientists postulate
outcomes in a complicated world of aleatory.
Mathematics is what mathematicians
do.
Evolution is what evolutionary scientists think. One is logically conclusive,
providing repeatable results.
At what point does the end.(evolution's
falsity).stop
justifying the means.(method{s}
used to obtain an end that somewhat appears plausible
and that, especially to fellow believers in evolution)?
Never it would seem, when one considers the fervor.of
some in the religion of evolution.
The faith of evolutionists is evident
in taking a tooth and contructing
their own breed of humans.
Modern science, for the most
part, is founded upon mathematics, and Darwin's theory upon speculation.
Concepts should be accessible
to experimental investigation. Does Darwinian evolution provide a mechanism,
for the production of life? Darwin thought so. Many today accept this,
not considering that Darwin doesn't base his conclusion on published models
for the gradual production of irreducibly
complex biochemical systems. In fact Darwin does not even consider
the molecular basis of life. A choking complexity strangles attempts to
scientifically account for molecular evolution. The criminals know how
to hide.
Concepts should be accessible
to experimental investigation. The scientific literature contains no evidence
that natural selection working on mutation
can produce an eye, a lens, a retina,
etc.
The more examining is done
by means of molecular biochemistry, animal behavior,
astrophysics,
etc., the more credible is the case against Darwin's gradual
evolutionary processes and the more remarkable
is the case for fully functioning and thus, perfectly ordered intelligently
designed irreducibly complex systems necessary for the sustaining of our
lives. This also includes designing
circumstances,
your presence here
and establishing the boundaries of nations.
Darwin's theory of evolution
is a
statistical.theory
arrived at by conjecture,
as it fails to trace the causal
links in the historical process, relying instead upon postulational
observations. As such, at best evolution can be called a hypothesis
and at worst, a
fable.
A few evolutionary scientists
believe life originated from crystals.
There is a reluctance
in science to embrace the inescapable conclusion of intelligent design.
Perhaps some scientists allow their chauvinism
to affect serious intellectual issues. If it were able to trace links in
the historical process, it would have at least a chance to formulate from
a basis, those propositions.(a
plan or scheme).used
as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena.
Hence,
the uniformity in the structure of particular species
is considered to be a consequence
of the stable
character of the mean.values
of such a development, rather than as the consequence of some special choice.(natural
selection acting upon random mutation, influenced by environmental factors).in
the starting state.
Design:.Why
is it difficult for humans to believe that God could design anything? Like
all things, if one doesn't ask questions of himself in life, like, 'I know
there's air, but why is there'?, his mind would avoid the why of it and
any lessons which could have been learnt
for his life are just skirted over him.
We many know where air comes
from, but why does this incredible function work as it does? The questions
lead us to God as designer and the answers confirm to us Who is above all
things:.Colossians
1:17 "And he is before all things and by him all things consist.".But
many people live life in a 'dumb
ass'.mode
because questing
for answers creates fear that they may have to change something about them.
In the words of John Henry
Newman, 1801-90, English clergyman, outstanding Christian thinker and writer."I
believe in design because I believe in God.(but
does
this being really exist?); not
in a God because I see design.".And
in this, we see a
key.
The intelligence of the
Infinite One is shown in the design of all things in the multiverse, some
of which are.1,
2,
3,.4,.5,.6,.7,.8,
9,.10,
11.
When things of that design are examined, man
copies that intelligence in things he makes.
William Dembski, in his
book,.Intelligent
Design: The Bridge Between Science and Theology, InterVarsity Press,
1999, talks of the way to recognize design is by observing whether or not
there is complex specified information.(CSI).
For example, a list of the first 100 prime
numbers contains structure too complicated to have arisen by
chance. Organisms have 'CSI' and therefore could not have arisen by
chance.
How can we know something
was designed? Obviously, we can know something was designed without knowing
who or what designed it. Anything designed refers to something.intelligent
behind its design.
The more design a things
exhibits,
the more R & D.(research
and development).has
gone into it. A sharpened stick is easier to construct than a precision
sword; a wooden raft easier to make than a nuclear submarine. Design must
first be ascertained
and apprehended
before there can be any further questions about the designer.
Planning denotes
a planner
and planning requires thinking.
